CII vs. SBAC
CII (BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by BlackRock, while SBAC (SBA Communications Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CII returned 14.94%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for SBAC. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CII vs. SBAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CII achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than SBAC's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CII has outperformed SBAC with an annualized return of 14.94%, while SBAC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.
CII
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 39.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 14.94%
SBAC
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- -1.81%
- 5Y*
- -6.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
CII vs. SBAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CII BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund | 7.72% | 37.78% | 12.70% | 18.47% | -13.21% | 34.26% | 8.11% | 30.46% | -8.60% | 27.73% |
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 7.24% | -3.13% | -18.18% | -8.15% | -27.30% | 38.95% | 17.81% | 49.30% | -0.90% | 58.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CII and SBAC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2004 | 0.32 |
The correlation between CII and SBAC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CII vs. SBAC — Risk / Return Rank
CII
SBAC
CII vs. SBAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CII | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.98 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | -0.27 | +3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.71 | -0.51 | +13.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CII vs. SBAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum SBAC drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and SBAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CII | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.43% | -99.65% | +43.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -29.80% | +18.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.05% | -32.21% | +11.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.32% | -54.50% | +32.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -54.50% | +13.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -43.24% | +36.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -35.39% | +29.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 15.94% | -12.89% |
Volatility
CII vs. SBAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) is 5.22%, while SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that CII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CII | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 10.25% | -5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 27.71% | -15.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 32.49% | -17.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 29.34% | -12.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 28.12% | -9.58% |
Dividends
CII vs. SBAC - Dividend Comparison
CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.93%, more than SBAC's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CII BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund | 15.35% | 16.65% | 6.15% | 6.28% | 12.27% | 4.98% | 6.03% | 5.79% | 7.06% | 6.07% | 8.38% | 8.49% |
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 2.30% | 2.30% | 1.92% | 1.34% | 1.01% | 0.60% | 0.66% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CII and SBAC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBAC has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to CII (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CII dropped -56.43% vs SBAC's -99.65%.
CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CII and SBAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer