PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CII vs. LBS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CII vs. LBS.TO

Last updated Jun 30, 2026
See Documentation

CII (BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by BlackRock, while LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CII returned 15.39%/yr vs 29.40%/yr for LBS.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CII vs. LBS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CII is traded in USD, while LBS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LBS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CII achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than LBS.TO's 85.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CII has underperformed LBS.TO with an annualized return of 15.39%, while LBS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.40% annualized return.

CII

1D
2.00%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
12.96%
6M
14.33%
1Y
41.39%
3Y*
22.96%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
15.39%

LBS.TO

1D
-0.38%
1M
28.37%
YTD
85.70%
6M
83.38%
1Y
152.33%
3Y*
57.25%
5Y*
35.59%
10Y*
29.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CII vs. LBS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund		12.96%37.78%12.70%18.47%-13.21%34.26%8.11%30.46%-8.60%27.73%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		85.70%62.84%27.75%13.10%-5.05%65.88%-0.81%51.20%-26.34%28.48%

Correlation

The correlation between CII and LBS.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2006

0.40

The correlation between CII and LBS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund

Life & Banc Split Corp.

Often compared with CII:
CII vs. SPYICII vs. ECATCII vs. ETYCII vs. BDJCII vs. SCHDCII vs. ARDCCII vs. YGLD.DE
Often compared with LBS.TO:
LBS.TO vs. BK.TOLBS.TO vs. SBC.TOLBS.TO vs. DFN.TOLBS.TO vs. FTN.TOLBS.TO vs. LCS.TOLBS.TO vs. VDY.TOLBS.TO vs. BCE.TO

Return for Risk

CII vs. LBS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
LBS.TO
LBS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CII vs. LBS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CIILBS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.63
3.37

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.44
3.88

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.81

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

5.95

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.03

25.52

-12.49

CII vs. LBS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CII Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the LBS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CII and LBS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CII vs. LBS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum LBS.TO drawdown of -87.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and LBS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CIILBS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.43%

-87.59%

+31.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-25.75%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-37.03%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-40.98%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-64.50%

+23.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-1.03%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-15.12%

+8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

5.99%

-2.80%

Volatility

CII vs. LBS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) is 6.11%, while Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that CII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CIILBS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

12.70%

-6.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

42.57%

-30.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

45.63%

-29.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

31.69%

-14.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.58%

39.99%

-21.41%

Dividends

CII vs. LBS.TO - Dividend Comparison

CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.28%, more than LBS.TO's 7.21% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund		15.28%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%
LBS.TO
Life & Banc Split Corp.		7.21%12.92%17.12%19.61%17.88%15.33%7.16%19.39%23.12%15.52%15.92%19.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

CII and LBS.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CII and LBS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer