PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CII vs. GIDHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CII vs. GIDHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CII having a 9.01% return and GIDHX slightly higher at 9.38%. Over the past 10 years, CII has outperformed GIDHX with an annualized return of 15.28%, while GIDHX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.34% annualized return.


CII

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.11%
1Y
41.18%
3Y*
22.38%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*
15.28%

GIDHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
9.38%
6M
8.74%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CII vs. GIDHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
9.01%37.78%12.70%18.47%-13.21%34.26%8.11%30.46%-8.60%27.73%
GIDHX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
9.38%28.92%-2.17%16.16%-13.41%9.36%1.20%14.82%-12.96%23.84%

Correlation

The correlation between CII and GIDHX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between CII and GIDHX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CII vs. GIDHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GIDHX
GIDHX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GIDHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CII vs. GIDHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIIGIDHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.69

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

10.66

+2.42

CII vs. GIDHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CII Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the GIDHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CII and GIDHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CII vs. GIDHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, which is greater than GIDHX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and GIDHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIIGIDHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.43%

-36.19%

-20.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-8.14%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-12.88%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-28.46%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-36.19%

-4.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.21%

-1.38%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-8.15%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.04%

+1.12%

Volatility

CII vs. GIDHX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund (GIDHX) at 4.10%. This indicates that CII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIIGIDHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

4.10%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

11.25%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

13.53%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

14.84%

+2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

15.39%

+3.18%

CII vs. GIDHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CII has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDHX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

CII vs. GIDHX - Dividend Comparison

CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.83%, more than GIDHX's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
15.83%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%
GIDHX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Dividend and Premium Fund
2.66%2.58%3.27%3.56%0.58%3.09%2.65%3.24%3.42%2.54%3.08%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CII and GIDHX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CII has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to GIDHX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CII dropped -56.43% vs GIDHX's -36.19%.

CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CII and GIDHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer