PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CII vs. DUK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CII vs. DUK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than DUK's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CII has outperformed DUK with an annualized return of 14.67%, while DUK has yielded a comparatively lower 8.48% annualized return.


CII

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
6.75%
6M
9.81%
1Y
38.45%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
14.67%

DUK

1D
-1.75%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
5.92%
6M
7.75%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
8.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CII vs. DUK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
6.75%37.78%12.70%18.47%-13.21%34.26%8.11%30.46%-8.60%27.73%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
5.92%12.72%15.56%-1.63%2.03%19.11%4.77%10.29%7.41%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CII and DUK is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2004

0.22

The correlation between CII and DUK shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CII vs. DUK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CII
CII Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CII Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CII Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CII Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CII Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

DUK
DUK Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CII vs. DUK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIIDUKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.12

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

0.89

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

2.14

+11.04

CII vs. DUK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CII Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the DUK Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CII and DUK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIIDUKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

0.66

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.44

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.42

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.49

+0.03

Drawdowns

CII vs. DUK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CII drawdown since its inception was -56.43%, smaller than the maximum DUK drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CII and DUK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIIDUKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.43%

-71.92%

+15.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-10.88%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-11.59%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

-24.16%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

-37.37%

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-7.76%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-10.85%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

4.51%

-1.58%

Volatility

CII vs. DUK - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund (CII) and Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) have volatilities of 5.46% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIIDUKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

5.37%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

11.14%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

14.64%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.83%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.55%

20.40%

-1.85%

Dividends

CII vs. DUK - Dividend Comparison

CII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.07%, more than DUK's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CII
BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund
16.07%16.65%6.15%6.28%12.27%4.98%6.03%5.79%7.06%6.07%8.38%8.49%
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
3.49%3.60%3.84%4.18%3.86%3.72%4.17%4.11%4.21%4.15%4.33%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


CII and DUK have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CII has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to DUK (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CII dropped -56.43% vs DUK's -71.92%.

CII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CII and DUK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer