PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIHEX vs. CSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIHEX achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than CSQ's 9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CIHEX has underperformed CSQ with an annualized return of 8.60%, while CSQ has yielded a comparatively higher 16.35% annualized return.


CIHEX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.71%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
8.60%

CSQ

1D
-0.97%
1M
5.33%
YTD
9.63%
6M
11.37%
1Y
26.44%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
16.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIHEX
Calamos Hedged Equity Fund
6.67%11.36%14.96%15.88%-11.11%13.31%9.66%14.47%0.87%8.37%
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
9.63%16.25%28.11%20.80%-24.26%30.77%26.22%38.62%-4.89%27.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CIHEX and CSQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.79

The correlation between CIHEX and CSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIHEX vs. CSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIHEX
CIHEX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CIHEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIHEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIHEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CIHEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIHEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CSQ
CSQ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIHEXCSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.33

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

1.74

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.34

7.53

+8.81

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIHEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the CSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIHEX and CSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIHEXCSQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.85

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.56

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.71

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.43

+0.39

Drawdowns

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIHEX drawdown since its inception was -17.80%, smaller than the maximum CSQ drawdown of -67.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIHEX and CSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIHEXCSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.80%

-67.17%

+49.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.68%

-15.25%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.80%

-24.18%

+14.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

-33.09%

+17.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.80%

-48.21%

+30.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-9.34%

+7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

3.52%

-2.47%

Volatility

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Hedged Equity Fund (CIHEX) is 1.63%, while Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that CIHEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIHEXCSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

4.02%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.76%

11.62%

-6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.46%

14.37%

-7.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.14%

19.97%

-10.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.39%

22.98%

-13.59%

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIHEX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQ's 2.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIHEX vs. CSQ - Dividend Comparison

CIHEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than CSQ's 6.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIHEX
Calamos Hedged Equity Fund
0.31%0.33%0.46%0.69%0.73%0.44%1.03%0.99%3.16%0.85%1.29%1.69%
CSQ
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
6.48%6.51%6.95%8.27%9.17%6.38%7.03%7.14%9.35%8.20%9.64%10.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIHEX and CSQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSQ has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to CIHEX (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIHEX dropped -17.80% vs CSQ's -67.17%.

CIHEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIHEX and CSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer