CIGYX vs. FHLFX

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

CIGYX (AB Concentrated International Growth Portfolio) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CIGYX returned -6.47%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CIGYX charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.

Performance

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Concentrated International Growth Portfolio (CIGYX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIGYX achieves a -4.46% return, which is significantly lower than FHLFX's 9.20% return.

CIGYX

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -1.18%
• 6M: -5.86%
• YTD: -4.46%
• 1Y: -8.07%
• 3Y*: -0.39%
• 5Y*: -6.47%
• 10Y*: 3.87%
• ALL TIME*: 3.50%

FHLFX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 4.76%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 1Y: 17.60%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIGYX AB Concentrated International Growth Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CIGYX AB Concentrated International Growth Portfolio	-4.46%	10.99%	-0.94%	4.26%	-30.89%	3.39%	22.61%	34.70%	-16.74%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	9.20%	31.96%	3.67%	18.16%	-14.17%	11.23%	8.09%	21.66%	-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CIGYX and FHLFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.90

The correlation between CIGYX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CIGYX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIGYX

CIGYX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CIGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CIGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CIGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CIGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CIGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FHLFX

FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Concentrated International Growth Portfolio (CIGYX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIGYX	FHLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.44	1.09	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	1.61	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.20	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	1.48	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	5.55	-6.63

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIGYX Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is lower than the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIGYX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIGYX drawdown since its inception was -45.02%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIGYX and FHLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIGYX	FHLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.02%	-33.58%	-11.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.78%	-11.37%	-8.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.30%	-13.62%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.02%	-29.36%	-15.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.88%	-2.19%	-28.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-6.02%	-10.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.13%	3.06%	+5.07%

Volatility

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

AB Concentrated International Growth Portfolio (CIGYX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.01%. This indicates that CIGYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIGYX	FHLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	4.01%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.25%	13.16%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.72%	15.61%	+4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.32%	16.08%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	17.62%	+0.55%

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIGYX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIGYX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

CIGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FHLFX's 3.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CIGYX AB Concentrated International Growth Portfolio	0.64%	0.61%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	1.82%	1.49%	0.99%	7.83%	3.22%	0.82%
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund	3.17%	3.46%	2.98%	2.86%	2.60%	2.47%	1.92%	1.95%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIGYX and FHLFX in my portfolio?

CIGYX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CIGYX or FHLFX?

CIGYX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to FHLFX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIGYX dropped -45.02% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.