PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIEN vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIEN vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIEN achieves a 61.22% return, which is significantly higher than GSG's 38.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CIEN has outperformed GSG with an annualized return of 34.99%, while GSG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.91% annualized return.


CIEN

1D
1.34%
1M
-10.75%
6M
49.74%
YTD
61.22%
1Y
325.42%
3Y*
107.88%
5Y*
45.34%
10Y*
34.99%
ALL TIME*
4.10%

GSG

1D
0.28%
1M
12.94%
6M
25.75%
YTD
38.94%
1Y
42.34%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
8.91%
ALL TIME*
-2.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$806.95M$796.48M$1.31B
$16.60M$17.31M$26.52M

CIEN vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
61.22%175.76%88.42%-11.71%-33.77%45.64%23.80%25.89%62.02%-14.26%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
38.94%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CIEN and GSG is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2006

0.19

The correlation between CIEN and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIEN vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CIEN
CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CIEN vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIENGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.29

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.52

2.16

+4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.70

6.99

+15.71

CIEN vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIEN Sharpe Ratio is 4.28, which is higher than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIEN and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIEN vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIEN drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than GSG's maximum drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIEN and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIENGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.51%

-89.62%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.31%

-18.81%

-28.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.31%

-18.81%

-28.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.54%

-29.12%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-57.64%

+8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.97%

-58.05%

-5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.96%

-63.67%

-23.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.56%

5.84%

+7.72%

Volatility

CIEN vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Ciena Corporation (CIEN) has a higher volatility of 24.88% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 8.11%. This indicates that CIEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIENGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.88%

8.11%

+16.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.38%

22.18%

+34.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.06%

24.23%

+47.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.12%

22.86%

+27.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.05%

22.06%

+22.99%

Dividends

CIEN vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIEN nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CIEN and GSG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIEN has higher volatility (24.88%) compared to GSG (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIEN dropped -99.51% vs GSG's -89.62%.

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIEN and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer