PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIEN vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIEN vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIEN achieves a 90.46% return, which is significantly higher than GSG's 32.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CIEN has outperformed GSG with an annualized return of 36.39%, while GSG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.40% annualized return.


CIEN

1D
-3.32%
1M
-0.12%
6M
90.15%
YTD
90.46%
1Y
472.91%
3Y*
120.66%
5Y*
50.88%
10Y*
36.39%

GSG

1D
3.60%
1M
-0.20%
6M
28.24%
YTD
32.35%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIEN vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
90.46%175.76%88.42%-11.71%-33.77%45.64%23.80%25.89%62.02%-14.26%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
32.35%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CIEN and GSG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2006

0.19

The correlation between CIEN and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIEN vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIEN
CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIEN vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIENGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.27

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.37

1.85

+12.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.23

6.29

+40.93

CIEN vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIEN Sharpe Ratio is 6.93, which is higher than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIEN and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIEN vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIEN drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than GSG's maximum drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIEN and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIENGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.51%

-89.62%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.19%

-18.81%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.51%

-18.81%

-26.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.54%

-29.12%

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-57.64%

+8.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.44%

-60.04%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.00%

-63.69%

-23.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.08%

5.51%

+4.57%

Volatility

CIEN vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Ciena Corporation (CIEN) has a higher volatility of 19.37% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 7.35%. This indicates that CIEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIENGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.37%

7.35%

+12.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.19%

21.50%

+31.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.96%

23.48%

+45.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.24%

22.80%

+26.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.60%

22.00%

+22.60%

Dividends

CIEN vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIEN nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CIEN and GSG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIEN has higher volatility (19.37%) compared to GSG (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIEN dropped -99.51% vs GSG's -89.62%.

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.93 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIEN and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer