PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIE.NEO vs. UFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CIE.NEO is traded in CAD, while UFO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UFO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIE.NEO achieves a 18.38% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 22.53% return.


CIE.NEO

1D
0.78%
1M
0.96%
YTD
18.38%
6M
18.82%
1Y
39.66%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
12.85%

UFO

1D
-1.80%
1M
-28.20%
YTD
22.53%
6M
18.54%
1Y
71.91%
3Y*
39.85%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CIE.NEO
iShares International Fundamental Common Class
18.38%34.92%12.83%15.59%-2.83%14.42%1.33%2.64%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
22.53%59.72%38.00%-4.67%-21.15%7.11%-4.47%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CIE.NEO and UFO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIE.NEO vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIE.NEO
CIE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CIE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

UFO
UFO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIE.NEOUFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.28

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.34

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

8.16

+6.50

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIE.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the UFO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIE.NEO and UFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIE.NEO drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -45.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIE.NEO and UFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIE.NEOUFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-45.72%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-30.90%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.44%

-30.90%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-45.34%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-30.90%

+29.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-19.86%

+12.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

8.84%

-6.12%

Volatility

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) is 6.18%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 17.37%. This indicates that CIE.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIE.NEOUFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

17.37%

-11.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

33.24%

-20.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

40.99%

-25.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

31.18%

-17.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

31.65%

-13.57%

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIE.NEO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIE.NEO vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

CIE.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than UFO's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIE.NEO
iShares International Fundamental Common Class
2.17%2.53%2.82%3.08%3.32%2.89%2.15%3.63%3.12%2.67%2.80%2.44%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
0.36%0.46%1.98%1.90%3.19%1.00%1.07%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIE.NEO and UFO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIE.NEO is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIE.NEO is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.

CIE.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Developed ex US 1000 Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for CIE.NEO and 0.75% for UFO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIE.NEO and UFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer