PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIE.NEO vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CIE.NEO is traded in CAD, while SOXX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SOXX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIE.NEO achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 103.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CIE.NEO has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 11.97%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.65% annualized return.


CIE.NEO

1D
0.42%
1M
6.88%
YTD
18.32%
6M
20.08%
1Y
40.12%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
15.60%
10Y*
11.97%

SOXX

1D
-2.01%
1M
27.53%
YTD
103.02%
6M
96.52%
1Y
184.54%
3Y*
58.88%
5Y*
37.78%
10Y*
36.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIE.NEO
iShares International Fundamental Common Class
18.32%34.92%12.83%15.59%-2.83%14.42%1.33%11.29%-8.19%16.74%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
103.02%34.28%22.63%63.44%-30.46%42.79%50.14%54.43%1.44%30.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CIE.NEO and SOXX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2009

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIE.NEO
CIE.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CIE.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIE.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIE.NEOSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.73

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

13.05

-9.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

46.76

-31.74

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIE.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 5.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIE.NEO and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIE.NEOSOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

5.49

-2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

1.10

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

1.15

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.04

-0.60

Drawdowns

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIE.NEO drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXX drawdown of -41.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIE.NEO and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIE.NEOSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.08%

-41.09%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-14.23%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.44%

-38.59%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.55%

-41.09%

+20.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.08%

-41.09%

+1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.01%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-8.12%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.96%

-1.28%

Volatility

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) is 4.82%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that CIE.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIE.NEOSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

13.95%

-9.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

27.10%

-15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

33.84%

-19.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

34.47%

-20.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

31.90%

-13.72%

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIE.NEO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIE.NEO vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

CIE.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIE.NEO
iShares International Fundamental Common Class
2.11%2.53%2.82%3.08%3.32%2.89%2.15%3.63%3.12%2.67%2.80%2.44%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIE.NEO and SOXX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CIE.NEO.

CIE.NEO is categorized as Global Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. CIE.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Developed ex US 1000 Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for CIE.NEO and 0.34% for SOXX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIE.NEO and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer