CICVX vs. HPF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CICVX (Calamos Convertible Fund) and HPF (John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, CICVX returned 12.56%/yr vs 4.88%/yr for HPF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CICVX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for HPF.

Performance

CICVX vs. HPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICVX achieves a 26.40% return, which is significantly higher than HPF's 2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CICVX has outperformed HPF with an annualized return of 12.56%, while HPF has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.

CICVX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 7.82%
• YTD: 26.40%
• 6M: 26.09%
• 1Y: 46.23%
• 3Y*: 20.94%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: 12.56%

HPF

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 6M: 1.71%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 2.93%
• 10Y*: 4.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CICVX vs. HPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund	26.40%	19.03%	9.94%	10.95%	-21.02%	5.36%	48.84%	19.51%	0.59%	14.21%
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II	2.64%	6.34%	14.41%	10.78%	-18.44%	17.90%	-7.67%	27.95%	-5.38%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CICVX and HPF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2002	0.38

Return for Risk

CICVX vs. HPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICVX

CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 91
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

HPF

HPF Risk / Return Rank: 21
HPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
HPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HPF Omega Ratio Rank: 23
HPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
HPF Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CICVX vs. HPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CICVX	HPF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.21	1.34	+1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	2.03	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.25	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.18	1.52	+4.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.05	4.77	+19.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CICVX vs. HPF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CICVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is higher than the HPF Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICVX and HPF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CICVX	HPF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21	1.34	+1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.19	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98	0.22	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.27	+0.08

Drawdowns

CICVX vs. HPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICVX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum HPF drawdown of -66.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICVX and HPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CICVX	HPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.33%	-66.73%	+17.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-7.18%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.79%	-16.91%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.17%	-31.24%	+4.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.17%	-54.76%	+27.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.84%	+2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.48%	-8.52%	-8.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.28%	-0.30%

Volatility

CICVX vs. HPF - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II (HPF) at 3.25%. This indicates that CICVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CICVX	HPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	3.25%	+1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.17%	6.60%	+5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.86%	8.15%	+6.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.89%	15.51%	-2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.89%	22.08%	-9.19%

CICVX vs. HPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CICVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HPF's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CICVX vs. HPF - Dividend Comparison

CICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than HPF's 9.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund	9.97%	12.51%	1.83%	2.48%	0.94%	15.90%	7.74%	1.39%	16.75%	4.55%	3.43%	5.41%
HPF John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II	9.34%	9.22%	8.95%	9.39%	9.45%	7.10%	7.80%	7.32%	8.96%	7.82%	8.30%	7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CICVX and HPF in my portfolio?

CICVX and HPF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CICVX or HPF?

CICVX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to HPF (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICVX dropped -49.33% vs HPF's -66.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.