CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L
CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from First Trust and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIBR.L returned 15.18%/yr vs 23.44%/yr for XSTC.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CIBR.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR.L achieves a 28.36% return, which is significantly higher than XSTC.L's 25.71% return.
CIBR.L
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 36.15%
- YTD
- 28.36%
- 6M
- 26.26%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- —
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 17.80%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 56.15%
- 3Y*
- 35.24%
- 5Y*
- 23.44%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 28.36% | 7.58% | 18.96% | 40.83% | -27.53% | 19.58% | 35.46% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 25.71% | 22.94% | 37.18% | 56.67% | -30.82% | 32.26% | 36.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR.L and XSTC.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CIBR.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CIBR.L
XSTC.L
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CIBR.L
XSTC.L
Communication Services
CIBR.L
XSTC.L
Industrials
CIBR.L
XSTC.L
Basic Materials
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Energy
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
Financial Services
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
Healthcare
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Real Estate
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Utilities
CIBR.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR.L
XSTC.L
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.19 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | 9.53 | -6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 2.80 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 1.00 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.08 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR.L drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -35.20% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -17.54% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -27.66% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.69% | -35.20% | +1.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.85% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -7.34% | -3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.05% | 5.88% | +4.17% |
Volatility
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 6.37%. This indicates that CIBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 6.37% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.81% | 14.94% | +6.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 20.00% | +4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 23.48% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 23.42% | +0.75% |
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
CIBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for CIBR.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer