CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - CIBR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIBR.L returned 15.18%/yr vs 25.84%/yr for XLKS.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIBR.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.

Performance

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR.L achieves a 28.36% return, which is significantly higher than XLKS.L's 26.46% return.

CIBR.L

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 36.15%
• YTD: 28.36%
• 6M: 26.26%
• 1Y: 25.63%
• 3Y*: 26.43%
• 5Y*: 15.18%
• 10Y*: —

XLKS.L

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 17.41%
• YTD: 26.46%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 57.45%
• 3Y*: 37.77%
• 5Y*: 25.84%
• 10Y*: 26.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	28.36%	7.58%	18.96%	40.83%	-27.53%	19.58%	35.46%
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	26.46%	24.23%	41.72%	60.64%	-29.12%	34.73%	33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR.L and XLKS.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020	0.72

The correlation between CIBR.L and XLKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CIBR.L	XLKS.L
Technology	95.6%	91.2%
Communication Services	2.6%	-
Industrials	1.8%	1.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	7.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR.L

CIBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CIBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CIBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CIBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

XLKS.L

XLKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XLKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
XLKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XLKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XLKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIBR.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	2.85	-1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	3.72	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.46	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	3.36	-2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.54	10.07	-7.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the XLKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR.L and XLKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIBR.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	2.85	-1.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	1.09	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.05	-0.30

Drawdowns

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR.L drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR.L and XLKS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.69%	-34.26%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.23%	-16.99%	-6.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.42%	-26.97%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.69%	-34.26%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.85%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.62%	-5.09%	-5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.05%	5.69%	+4.36%

Volatility

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) at 6.80%. This indicates that CIBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR.L	XLKS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.38%	6.80%	+4.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.81%	15.34%	+6.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.92%	20.11%	+4.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.15%	23.78%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.17%	22.03%	+2.14%

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIBR.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR.L and XLKS.L in my portfolio?

CIBR.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIBR.L or XLKS.L?

On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR.L or XLKS.L?

XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.L.

What is the main difference between CIBR.L and XLKS.L?

CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.