CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and HTWD.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CIBR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while HTWD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIBR.L returned 13.75%/yr vs 20.24%/yr for HTWD.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HTWD.L.

Performance

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR.L achieves a 29.65% return, which is significantly lower than HTWD.L's 57.53% return.

CIBR.L

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: 8.41%
• 6M: 30.61%
• YTD: 29.65%
• 1Y: 26.20%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 13.75%
• 10Y*: —

HTWD.L

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -6.47%
• 6M: 50.40%
• YTD: 57.53%
• 1Y: 84.50%
• 3Y*: 40.11%
• 5Y*: 20.24%
• 10Y*: 20.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	29.65%	7.59%	18.94%	40.85%	-27.53%	19.58%	42.96%
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF	57.53%	32.26%	25.40%	28.98%	-29.41%	27.78%	51.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR.L and HTWD.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2020	0.48

The correlation between CIBR.L and HTWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR.L

CIBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CIBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
CIBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CIBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CIBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 24

HTWD.L

HTWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
HTWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
HTWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HTWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
HTWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HTWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIBR.L	HTWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	3.04	-2.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	3.68	-2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.49	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	7.40	-6.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.56	20.03	-17.47

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the HTWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR.L and HTWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR.L drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum HTWD.L drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR.L and HTWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIBR.L	HTWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.69%	-41.06%	+7.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.23%	-11.22%	-12.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.42%	-28.22%	+4.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.69%	-41.06%	+7.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.96%	-10.43%	+8.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.36%	-9.65%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.22%	4.16%	+6.06%

Volatility

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) is 8.39%, while HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF (HTWD.L) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that CIBR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIBR.L	HTWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.39%	10.99%	-2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.52%	23.75%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	27.32%	-0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.52%	23.58%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.09%	21.64%	+2.45%

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HTWD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIBR.L vs. HTWD.L - Dividend Comparison

CIBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTWD.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF	1.04%	1.53%	1.18%	2.73%	3.31%	1.13%	1.69%	2.08%	2.79%	1.37%	2.64%	2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIBR.L and HTWD.L in my portfolio?

CIBR.L and HTWD.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIBR.L or HTWD.L?

On fees, HTWD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIBR.L or HTWD.L?

HTWD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.L.

What is the main difference between CIBR.L and HTWD.L?

CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while HTWD.L tracks HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR.L and 0.50% for HTWD.L.