CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L
CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and FEXD.L (First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - CIBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FEXD.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CIBR.L returned 15.18%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for FEXD.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIBR.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FEXD.L.
Performance
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CIBR.L is traded in USD, while FEXD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEXD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBR.L achieves a 28.36% return, which is significantly higher than FEXD.L's 13.91% return.
CIBR.L
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 36.15%
- YTD
- 28.36%
- 6M
- 26.26%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 15.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FEXD.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 15.32%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 28.36% | 7.58% | 18.96% | 40.83% | -27.53% | 19.58% | 35.46% |
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B | 13.91% | 14.59% | 15.47% | 12.65% | -13.37% | 26.02% | 24.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBR.L and FEXD.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.49 |
The correlation between CIBR.L and FEXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CIBR.L
FEXD.L
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIBR.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.53 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 7.17 | -6.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.54 | 25.28 | -22.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIBR.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 3.09 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.68 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBR.L drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum FEXD.L drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR.L and FEXD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBR.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -39.16% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -5.43% | -17.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -20.26% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.69% | -21.85% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -5.26% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.05% | 3.34% | +6.71% |
Volatility
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.38% compared to First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B (FEXD.L) at 4.05%. This indicates that CIBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBR.L | FEXD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.38% | 4.05% | +7.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.81% | 9.33% | +12.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.92% | 12.65% | +12.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 18.17% | +5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 19.69% | +4.48% |
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FEXD.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIBR.L vs. FEXD.L - Dividend Comparison
CIBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEXD.L First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX UCITS Class B | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBR.L and FEXD.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIBR.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIBR.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEXD.L.
CIBR.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FEXD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while FEXD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR.L and 0.75% for FEXD.L.
Find the right allocation for CIBR.L and FEXD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer