CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CIB0.DE (VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A) and TRET.DE (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIB0.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG, while TRET.DE is a REIT fund tracking the GPR Global 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CIB0.DE returned -8.20%/yr vs 7.84%/yr for TRET.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CIB0.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TRET.DE.

Performance

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIB0.DE achieves a -14.18% return, which is significantly lower than TRET.DE's 5.31% return.

CIB0.DE

• 1D: 3.05%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: -14.18%
• 6M: -17.46%
• 1Y: -15.36%
• 3Y*: -8.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRET.DE

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 6M: 4.13%
• 1Y: 9.15%
• 3Y*: 7.84%
• 5Y*: 3.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CIB0.DE VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A	-14.18%	-10.00%	5.16%	2.09%	-1.65%
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	5.31%	1.87%	6.86%	9.89%	-3.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CIB0.DE and TRET.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022	0.45

Return for Risk

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIB0.DE

CIB0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2
CIB0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CIB0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CIB0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CIB0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CIB0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 0

TRET.DE

TRET.DE Risk / Return Rank: 23
TRET.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TRET.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
TRET.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
TRET.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TRET.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIB0.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	0.75	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.20	1.13	-2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.13	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	1.05	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.67	3.38	-5.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIB0.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the TRET.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIB0.DE and TRET.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIB0.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	0.75	-1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.22	-0.53

Drawdowns

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIB0.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.60%, smaller than the maximum TRET.DE drawdown of -41.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB0.DE and TRET.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIB0.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.60%	-41.75%	+9.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.47%	-8.35%	-15.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.60%	-18.60%	-14.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.26%	-4.46%	-23.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-12.19%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.08%	2.59%	+6.49%

Volatility

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) at 3.05%. This indicates that CIB0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRET.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIB0.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.42%	3.05%	+3.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.62%	9.21%	+3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	11.66%	+5.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.95%	15.15%	+2.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.95%	17.83%	+0.12%

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIB0.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TRET.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIB0.DE vs. TRET.DE - Dividend Comparison

CIB0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRET.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CIB0.DE VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	3.48%	3.66%	3.44%	3.66%	4.69%	1.78%	4.45%	3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIB0.DE and TRET.DE in my portfolio?

CIB0.DE and TRET.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIB0.DE or TRET.DE?

On fees, TRET.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIB0.DE or TRET.DE?

TRET.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CIB0.DE.

What is the main difference between CIB0.DE and TRET.DE?

CIB0.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while TRET.DE is REIT. CIB0.DE tracks MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG, while TRET.DE tracks GPR Global 100. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CIB0.DE and 0.25% for TRET.DE.