CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO).

CIAI.TO and FINN.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIAI.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Investments. It was launched on May 2, 2024. FINN.NEO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on May 19, 2023.

Performance

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	-4.24%	18.84%	29.92%
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF	3.53%	20.61%	22.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a -4.24% return, which is significantly lower than FINN.NEO's 3.53% return.

CIAI.TO

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -4.24%
• 6M: -5.88%
• 1Y: 35.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FINN.NEO

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: 37.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIAI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FINN.NEO's 1.13% expense ratio.

FINN.NEO

Fidelity Global Innovators ETF

CIAI.TO

CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF

Return for Risk

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIAI.TO

CIAI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 62
CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CIAI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CIAI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CIAI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CIAI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FINN.NEO

FINN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 80
FINN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FINN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FINN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FINN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FINN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIAI.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.54	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	2.11	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.28	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.95	-1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.38	9.28	-3.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the FINN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIAI.TO and FINN.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIAI.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.54	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	1.58	-0.78

Correlation

The correlation between CIAI.TO and FINN.NEO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIAI.TO nor FINN.NEO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, which is greater than FINN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and FINN.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIAI.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.22%	-25.66%	-5.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.93%	-13.04%	-5.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.68%	-4.90%	-8.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.87%	-4.21%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.75%	4.15%	+2.60%

Volatility

CIAI.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) have volatilities of 9.84% and 9.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIAI.TO	FINN.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.84%	9.76%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.32%	17.43%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.76%	24.53%	+6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.70%	22.01%	+6.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.70%	22.01%	+6.69%