CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L
CI2G.L (Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD) and MPXG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Amundi - CI2G.L tracks the MSCI India NR USD while MPXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CI2G.L returned 1.96%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for MPXG.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CI2G.L charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MPXG.L.
Performance
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI2G.L achieves a -12.55% return, which is significantly lower than MPXG.L's 2.07% return.
CI2G.L
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -12.55%
- 6M
- -13.41%
- 1Y
- -12.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
MPXG.L
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI2G.L Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD | -12.55% | -5.46% | 11.34% | 12.20% | -1.80% |
MPXG.L Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.07% | 5.53% | 2.02% | -1.23% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CI2G.L and MPXG.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CI2G.L
MPXG.L
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CI2G.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.07 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.59 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 1.49 | -2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CI2G.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | 0.38 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.26 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI2G.L drawdown since its inception was -37.13%, which is greater than MPXG.L's maximum drawdown of -16.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI2G.L and MPXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CI2G.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.13% | -16.94% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.32% | -7.42% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | -15.75% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.55% | -6.14% | -17.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -5.30% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.84% | 2.87% | +5.97% |
Volatility
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L) at 3.79%. This indicates that CI2G.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CI2G.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 3.79% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.70% | 9.17% | +4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 11.43% | +4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 14.91% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 14.91% | +4.86% |
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CI2G.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MPXG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CI2G.L vs. MPXG.L - Dividend Comparison
CI2G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CI2G.L Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPXG.L Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.17% | 3.24% | 3.36% | 3.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CI2G.L and MPXG.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MPXG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MPXG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CI2G.L.
CI2G.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while MPXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CI2G.L and 0.15% for MPXG.L.
Find the right allocation for CI2G.L and MPXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer