PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHYDX vs. PIAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHYDX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than PIAMX's 0.79% return.


CHYDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.03%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
5.05%

PIAMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.23%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CHYDX
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund
1.77%6.72%7.78%12.26%-10.35%6.44%4.78%14.29%-5.38%
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
0.79%2.34%11.23%16.38%-10.93%7.82%9.05%11.77%-2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CHYDX and PIAMX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.75

The correlation between CHYDX and PIAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHYDX vs. PIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHYDX
CHYDX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CHYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CHYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PIAMX
PIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHYDXPIAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.26

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.06

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.24

3.17

+14.07

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHYDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the PIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHYDX and PIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHYDXPIAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

1.27

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.02

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.22

-0.17

Drawdowns

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHYDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than PIAMX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYDX and PIAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHYDXPIAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-18.15%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-3.75%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

-6.17%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.66%

-13.92%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.55%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-2.34%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

1.25%

-0.88%

Volatility

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) have volatilities of 0.69% and 0.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHYDXPIAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.68%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

2.43%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23%

3.12%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

4.04%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

4.23%

+0.73%

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHYDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PIAMX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHYDX vs. PIAMX - Dividend Comparison

CHYDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than PIAMX's 7.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHYDX
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund
6.08%6.39%6.30%6.28%5.47%4.48%5.26%5.85%6.62%4.87%4.94%5.43%
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
7.90%9.12%8.49%8.12%7.99%8.64%6.63%6.96%7.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHYDX and PIAMX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHYDX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to PIAMX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHYDX dropped -35.03% vs PIAMX's -18.15%.

CHYDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHYDX and PIAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer