PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHYDX vs. CTRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHYDX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than CTRIX's -0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CHYDX has outperformed CTRIX with an annualized return of 5.04%, while CTRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.


CHYDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
1.77%
6M
2.03%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
5.04%

CTRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHYDX
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund
1.77%6.72%7.78%12.26%-10.35%6.44%4.78%14.29%-4.30%6.05%
CTRIX
Calamos Total Return Bond Fund
-0.04%7.31%1.49%4.78%-12.91%-1.27%6.97%9.24%-1.10%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CHYDX and CTRIX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2007

0.18

Over the past year, CHYDX and CTRIX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHYDX vs. CTRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHYDX
CHYDX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CHYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CHYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CTRIX
CTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHYDXCTRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.22

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

1.63

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.86

4.84

+12.02

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHYDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the CTRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHYDX and CTRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHYDXCTRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.19

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

-0.01

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.34

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.50

+0.55

Drawdowns

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHYDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than CTRIX's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYDX and CTRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHYDXCTRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-17.84%

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-2.79%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

-6.23%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.66%

-17.84%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.35%

-17.84%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-2.06%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-3.04%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.94%

-0.57%

Volatility

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) is 0.69%, while Calamos Total Return Bond Fund (CTRIX) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that CHYDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHYDXCTRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

1.33%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

2.75%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

3.86%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

5.54%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

4.59%

+0.37%

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHYDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CTRIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHYDX vs. CTRIX - Dividend Comparison

CHYDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than CTRIX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHYDX
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund
6.08%6.39%6.30%6.28%5.47%4.48%5.26%5.85%6.62%4.87%4.94%5.43%
CTRIX
Calamos Total Return Bond Fund
3.55%3.90%3.63%2.61%2.71%3.46%2.42%2.79%2.89%3.29%2.76%4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHYDX and CTRIX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTRIX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to CHYDX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHYDX dropped -35.03% vs CTRIX's -17.84%.

CHYDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHYDX and CTRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer