CHY vs. LCFYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHY (Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund) and LCFYX (Lord Abbett Convertible Fund) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, CHY returned 12.95%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for LCFYX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHY charges 2.64%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for LCFYX.

Performance

CHY vs. LCFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHY achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly lower than LCFYX's 22.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHY having a 12.95% annualized return and LCFYX not far ahead at 13.47%.

CHY

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 6.74%
• YTD: 21.02%
• 6M: 21.09%
• 1Y: 40.53%
• 3Y*: 20.40%
• 5Y*: 6.51%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

LCFYX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.66%
• YTD: 22.50%
• 6M: 22.85%
• 1Y: 42.12%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHY vs. LCFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHY Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund	21.02%	3.97%	17.24%	20.78%	-28.05%	22.17%	36.75%	32.63%	-12.60%	24.44%
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund	22.50%	22.27%	13.91%	7.25%	-23.24%	1.34%	64.36%	24.25%	-5.76%	16.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CHY and LCFYX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2003	0.53

The correlation between CHY and LCFYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CHY vs. LCFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHY

CHY Risk / Return Rank: 77
CHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
CHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CHY Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CHY Martin Ratio Rank: 90

LCFYX

LCFYX Risk / Return Rank: 87
LCFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LCFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LCFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LCFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LCFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHY vs. LCFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHY	LCFYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.93	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.80	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	6.11	-2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.10	22.84	-4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHY vs. LCFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the LCFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHY and LCFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHY	LCFYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	2.93	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.57	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.99	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.76	-0.36

Drawdowns

CHY vs. LCFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHY drawdown since its inception was -60.53%, which is greater than LCFYX's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHY and LCFYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHY	LCFYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.53%	-39.17%	-21.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.42%	-7.06%	-4.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.32%	-12.16%	-12.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.99%	-30.74%	-5.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.41%	-33.42%	-16.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	0.00%	-1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-8.40%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.89%	+0.35%

Volatility

CHY vs. LCFYX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Lord Abbett Convertible Fund (LCFYX) at 5.39%. This indicates that CHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHY	LCFYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.10%	5.39%	+1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.35%	12.20%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.72%	14.74%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.31%	12.98%	+6.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	13.65%	+9.62%

CHY vs. LCFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHY has a 2.64% expense ratio, which is higher than LCFYX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHY vs. LCFYX - Dividend Comparison

CHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, more than LCFYX's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHY Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund	9.06%	10.61%	9.88%	10.46%	11.37%	7.42%	7.14%	8.72%	12.13%	10.13%	11.37%	11.42%
LCFYX Lord Abbett Convertible Fund	1.27%	1.88%	2.31%	2.06%	2.73%	18.40%	16.22%	8.76%	4.99%	2.54%	3.72%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHY and LCFYX in my portfolio?

CHY and LCFYX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHY or LCFYX?

CHY has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to LCFYX (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHY dropped -60.53% vs LCFYX's -39.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.