PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHUSX vs. NEFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Global Focus Fund (CHUSX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHUSX achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than NEFFX's 19.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CHUSX has underperformed NEFFX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while NEFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.01% annualized return.


CHUSX

1D
-2.97%
1M
1.38%
YTD
9.15%
6M
8.25%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
11.57%

NEFFX

1D
-3.34%
1M
3.14%
YTD
19.96%
6M
19.72%
1Y
44.55%
3Y*
29.86%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
17.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHUSX
Alger Global Focus Fund
9.15%7.71%40.01%24.23%-32.05%14.05%38.85%23.58%-15.83%22.86%
NEFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2
19.96%31.31%23.87%29.47%-29.50%12.31%33.79%26.75%-4.17%34.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CHUSX and NEFFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2008

0.89

The correlation between CHUSX and NEFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHUSX vs. NEFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHUSX
CHUSX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CHUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CHUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

NEFFX
NEFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Global Focus Fund (CHUSX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHUSXNEFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.44

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

3.61

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

15.57

-11.98

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHUSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the NEFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHUSX and NEFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHUSX drawdown since its inception was -69.31%, which is greater than NEFFX's maximum drawdown of -45.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHUSX and NEFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHUSXNEFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.31%

-45.12%

-24.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-13.32%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-20.78%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.48%

-36.95%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.48%

-36.95%

-4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-3.34%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.44%

-7.59%

-10.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.08%

+0.41%

Volatility

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Global Focus Fund (CHUSX) is 8.56%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2 (NEFFX) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that CHUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHUSXNEFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

9.04%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.55%

15.66%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

18.98%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.14%

19.72%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.34%

19.21%

+2.13%

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHUSX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NEFFX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHUSX vs. NEFFX - Dividend Comparison

CHUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, which matches NEFFX's 8.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHUSX
Alger Global Focus Fund
8.21%8.97%32.77%0.00%0.00%9.87%0.00%2.77%9.32%4.03%1.01%0.00%
NEFFX
American Funds The New Economy Fund® Class F-2
8.23%9.87%9.61%4.19%0.19%7.55%2.69%7.57%10.31%8.50%2.51%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHUSX and NEFFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEFFX has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to CHUSX (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHUSX dropped -69.31% vs NEFFX's -45.12%.

NEFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHUSX and NEFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer