CHTTX vs. RSVAX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CHTTX (AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund) and RSVAX (Victory RS Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CHTTX returned 8.21%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for RSVAX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHTTX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RSVAX.

Performance

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund (CHTTX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHTTX achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than RSVAX's 5.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CHTTX has underperformed RSVAX with an annualized return of 8.21%, while RSVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.12% annualized return.

CHTTX

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: -1.06%
• 6M: -12.01%
• 1Y: -4.20%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 6.53%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

RSVAX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 5.88%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 12.13%
• 3Y*: 10.35%
• 5Y*: 6.14%
• 10Y*: 9.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHTTX AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund	-1.06%	-1.64%	13.52%	22.65%	-8.48%	27.04%	3.83%	23.39%	-18.57%	11.51%
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund	5.88%	4.58%	12.58%	7.63%	-2.98%	27.30%	-2.60%	31.36%	-10.84%	17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CHTTX and RSVAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 1994	0.73

The correlation between CHTTX and RSVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CHTTX vs. RSVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHTTX

CHTTX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CHTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CHTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CHTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CHTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CHTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

RSVAX

RSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 16
RSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
RSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
RSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund (CHTTX) and Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHTTX	RSVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	0.99	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	1.49	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.17	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	1.51	-1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.46	5.15	-5.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHTTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the RSVAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHTTX and RSVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHTTX	RSVAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	0.99	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.34	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.48	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.41	+0.11

Drawdowns

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.30%, roughly equal to the maximum RSVAX drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHTTX and RSVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHTTX	RSVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.30%	-59.23%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.80%	-7.81%	-9.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.80%	-17.98%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.38%	-23.58%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.58%	-43.49%	+0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.76%	-2.27%	-12.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	-13.81%	+6.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	2.28%	+7.01%

Volatility

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Volatility Comparison

AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund (CHTTX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) at 3.01%. This indicates that CHTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHTTX	RSVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	3.01%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.52%	8.42%	+8.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.92%	11.91%	+7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.56%	18.10%	+0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.49%	19.20%	+1.29%

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHTTX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSVAX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHTTX vs. RSVAX - Dividend Comparison

CHTTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHTTX AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund	0.00%	0.00%	14.37%	0.40%	9.34%	105.09%	5.66%	13.63%	8.79%	6.59%	4.51%	5.97%
RSVAX Victory RS Value Fund	8.34%	8.83%	9.89%	6.48%	6.33%	14.14%	1.93%	7.38%	15.47%	25.04%	12.47%	9.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHTTX and RSVAX in my portfolio?

CHTTX and RSVAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHTTX or RSVAX?

CHTTX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to RSVAX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHTTX dropped -58.30% vs RSVAX's -59.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.