PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHTTX vs. HAMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund (CHTTX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHTTX achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than HAMVX's 16.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CHTTX has underperformed HAMVX with an annualized return of 8.26%, while HAMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


CHTTX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.18%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-11.57%
1Y
-3.80%
3Y*
9.58%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
8.26%

HAMVX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.32%
YTD
16.65%
6M
17.88%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHTTX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund
-0.60%-1.64%13.52%22.65%-8.48%27.04%3.83%23.39%-18.57%11.51%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
16.65%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CHTTX and HAMVX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002

0.91

The correlation between CHTTX and HAMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHTTX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHTTX
CHTTX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CHTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CHTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund (CHTTX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHTTXHAMVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.13

2.75

-2.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

3.97

-4.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.48

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

5.41

-5.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.27

19.16

-19.43

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHTTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the HAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHTTX and HAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHTTXHAMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

2.75

-2.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.57

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.48

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.40

+0.12

Drawdowns

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.30%, smaller than the maximum HAMVX drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHTTX and HAMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHTTXHAMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.30%

-64.17%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.80%

-6.84%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-21.04%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.38%

-21.04%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.58%

-51.44%

+8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.37%

0.00%

-14.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-9.98%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.24%

1.93%

+7.31%

Volatility

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison

AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund (CHTTX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHTTXHAMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

3.24%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

9.24%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.92%

13.45%

+5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

18.83%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

21.90%

-1.41%

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHTTX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHTTX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison

CHTTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHTTX
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%14.37%0.40%9.34%105.09%5.66%13.63%8.79%6.59%4.51%5.97%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
7.43%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHTTX and HAMVX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHTTX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to HAMVX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHTTX dropped -58.30% vs HAMVX's -64.17%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHTTX and HAMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer