PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHSCP vs. CHSCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CHS Inc. (CHSCP) and CHS Inc. (CHSCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHSCP achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than CHSCN's 2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, CHSCP has underperformed CHSCN with an annualized return of 5.05%, while CHSCN has yielded a comparatively higher 5.39% annualized return.


CHSCP

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.24%
6M
3.55%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
5.05%

CHSCN

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
2.88%
6M
3.76%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
7.31%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
5.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHSCP
CHS Inc.
1.24%5.36%-2.63%17.86%-3.07%10.34%14.39%12.12%-4.85%9.82%
CHSCN
CHS Inc.
2.88%5.81%8.36%10.10%-5.14%5.33%9.22%17.87%-3.60%9.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CHSCP and CHSCN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2014

0.32

The correlation between CHSCP and CHSCN shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHSCP:

$35.59B

CHSCN:

$35.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHSCP:

$1.06B

CHSCN:

$1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHSCP:

$1.12B

CHSCN:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHS Inc.

CHS Inc.

Return for Risk

CHSCP vs. CHSCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHSCP
CHSCP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CHSCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHSCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHSCP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CHSCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHSCP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CHSCN
CHSCN Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CHSCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHSCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHSCN Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CHSCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHSCN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CHS Inc. (CHSCP) and CHS Inc. (CHSCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHSCPCHSCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

3.90

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

12.09

-10.24

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHSCP Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the CHSCN Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHSCP and CHSCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHSCPCHSCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.37

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.48

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.28

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.37

+0.24

Drawdowns

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHSCP drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum CHSCN drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHSCP and CHSCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHSCPCHSCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.06%

-42.38%

+26.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-1.86%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.26%

-6.73%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.08%

-11.26%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.44%

-42.38%

+26.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-0.98%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-3.09%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

0.60%

+3.41%

Volatility

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Volatility Comparison

CHS Inc. (CHSCP) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to CHS Inc. (CHSCN) at 1.27%. This indicates that CHSCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHSCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHSCPCHSCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

1.27%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.72%

3.75%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

5.34%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.76%

9.54%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.97%

19.47%

-6.50%

Dividends

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Dividend Comparison

CHSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than CHSCN's 7.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHSCN
CHS Inc.
7.05%7.13%7.03%7.11%7.30%6.46%6.38%6.52%7.19%6.49%6.70%6.51%
CHSCP
CHS Inc.
7.26%7.22%7.09%6.46%7.13%6.47%6.69%7.14%7.47%6.64%6.83%6.46%

Financials

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CHS Inc. and CHS Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B13.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
8.35B
8.35B
(CHSCP) Total Revenue
(CHSCN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHSCP vs. CHSCN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CHS Inc. and CHS Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
0.3%
0.3%
Portfolio components
CHSCP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.82M and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.

CHSCN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.82M and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.

CHSCP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of -241.79M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

CHSCN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of -241.79M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

CHSCP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of -147.05M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.

CHSCN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of -147.05M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHSCP and CHSCN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHSCP has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to CHSCN (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHSCP dropped -16.06% vs CHSCN's -42.38%.

CHSCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHSCP and CHSCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer