CHSCP vs. CHSCM
CHSCP (CHS Inc.) and CHSCM (CHS Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Farm Products industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, CHSCP returned 5.05%/yr vs 5.61%/yr for CHSCM. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHSCP achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than CHSCM's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, CHSCP has underperformed CHSCM with an annualized return of 5.05%, while CHSCM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.61% annualized return.
CHSCP
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 7.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
CHSCM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between CHSCP and CHSCM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2014 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
CHSCP:
$35.59B
CHSCM:
$35.59B
CHSCP:
$1.06B
CHSCM:
$1.06B
CHSCP:
$1.12B
CHSCM:
$1.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHSCP vs. CHSCM — Risk / Return Rank
CHSCP
CHSCM
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CHS Inc. (CHSCP) and CHS Inc. (CHSCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHSCP | CHSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.05 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.20 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.25 | -1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 7.41 | -5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHSCP | CHSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.05 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.31 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.38 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHSCP drawdown since its inception was -16.06%, smaller than the maximum CHSCM drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHSCP and CHSCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHSCP | CHSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -42.50% | +26.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -3.12% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.26% | -6.28% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.08% | -11.99% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.44% | -42.50% | +27.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -0.66% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -2.85% | -0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 0.94% | +3.06% |
Volatility
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Volatility Comparison
CHS Inc. (CHSCP) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to CHS Inc. (CHSCM) at 1.86%. This indicates that CHSCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHSCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHSCP | CHSCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 1.86% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.93% | 4.34% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 6.74% | +2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 10.02% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 18.37% | -5.40% |
Dividends
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Dividend Comparison
CHSCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than CHSCM's 6.75% yield.
Financials
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CHS Inc. and CHS Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHSCP vs. CHSCM - Profitability Comparison
CHSCP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.82M and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.
CHSCM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.82M and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.3%.
CHSCP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of -241.79M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
CHSCM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported an operating income of -241.79M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
CHSCP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of -147.05M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
CHSCM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CHS Inc. reported a net income of -147.05M and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of -1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHSCP and CHSCM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHSCP has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to CHSCM (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHSCP dropped -16.06% vs CHSCM's -42.50%.
CHSCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHSCP and CHSCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer