CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC
CHRT.L (Cohort plc) and IDR.MC (Indra A) are both stocks. CHRT.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while IDR.MC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CHRT.L returned 16.72%/yr vs 20.53%/yr for IDR.MC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHRT.L is traded in GBp, while IDR.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IDR.MC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRT.L achieves a 41.48% return, which is significantly higher than IDR.MC's 11.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRT.L has underperformed IDR.MC with an annualized return of 16.72%, while IDR.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 20.53% annualized return.
CHRT.L
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 10.19%
- YTD
- 41.48%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- -16.02%
- 3Y*
- 41.19%
- 5Y*
- 17.88%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
IDR.MC
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- 61.82%
- 3Y*
- 70.07%
- 5Y*
- 52.04%
- 10Y*
- 20.53%
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 41.48% | -15.64% | 99.97% | 13.45% | -3.81% | -14.13% | -10.63% | 94.12% | 14.53% | -15.82% |
IDR.MC Indra A | 11.25% | 201.44% | 18.00% | 31.64% | 19.91% | 27.92% | -27.56% | 16.60% | -27.08% | 14.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRT.L and IDR.MC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, CHRT.L and IDR.MC have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC — Risk / Return Rank
CHRT.L
IDR.MC
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohort plc (CHRT.L) and Indra A (IDR.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRT.L | IDR.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.25 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.00 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 5.06 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRT.L | IDR.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 1.26 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 1.44 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.58 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRT.L drawdown since its inception was -72.53%, which is greater than IDR.MC's maximum drawdown of -63.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRT.L and IDR.MC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRT.L | IDR.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.53% | -63.75% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.22% | -30.40% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.22% | -30.40% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.22% | -30.40% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -62.76% | +14.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.92% | -16.12% | -9.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -26.13% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.70% | 12.10% | +15.60% |
Volatility
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC - Volatility Comparison
Cohort plc (CHRT.L) has a higher volatility of 20.91% compared to Indra A (IDR.MC) at 10.99%. This indicates that CHRT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDR.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRT.L | IDR.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.91% | 10.99% | +9.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.58% | 39.82% | -3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.95% | 48.63% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.90% | 35.47% | +5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 34.57% | +0.44% |
Dividends
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC - Dividend Comparison
CHRT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than IDR.MC's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.36% | 2.41% | 2.43% | 1.42% | 2.15% | 1.26% | 2.16% | 2.09% | 1.46% | 1.31% |
IDR.MC Indra A | 0.46% | 0.52% | 1.46% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CHRT.L vs. IDR.MC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohort plc and Indra A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRT.L and IDR.MC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CHRT.L and IDR.MC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer