CHRT.L vs. CMCSA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohort plc (CHRT.L) and Comcast Corporation (CMCSA).
Performance
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 44.81% | -15.64% | 99.97% | 13.45% | -3.81% | -14.13% | -10.63% | 94.12% | 14.53% | -15.82% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 10.00% | -23.24% | -10.30% | 22.63% | -20.20% | -1.30% | 15.63% | 28.94% | -7.54% | 7.30% |
Different Trading Currencies
CHRT.L is traded in GBp, while CMCSA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CMCSA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
CHRT.L:
£607.39M
CMCSA:
$101.55B
CHRT.L:
£0.85
CMCSA:
$5.34
CHRT.L:
15.38
CMCSA:
5.23
CHRT.L:
0.40
CMCSA:
0.11
CHRT.L:
1.14
CMCSA:
0.84
CHRT.L:
3.67
CMCSA:
1.05
CHRT.L:
£507.09M
CMCSA:
$123.71B
CHRT.L:
£152.43M
CMCSA:
$74.31B
CHRT.L:
£68.05M
CMCSA:
$46.79B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRT.L achieves a 44.81% return, which is significantly higher than CMCSA's 10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CHRT.L has outperformed CMCSA with an annualized return of 15.09%, while CMCSA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.59% annualized return.
CHRT.L
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 44.81%
- 6M
- -5.92%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 45.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.09%
CMCSA
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- 10.00%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- -11.63%
- 3Y*
- -4.52%
- 5Y*
- -6.74%
- 10Y*
- 3.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA — Risk / Return Rank
CHRT.L
CMCSA
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohort plc (CHRT.L) and Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRT.L | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | -0.43 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | -0.46 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.95 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | -0.42 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | -0.82 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRT.L | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | -0.43 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.26 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.14 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.31 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRT.L and CMCSA is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Dividend Comparison
CHRT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than CMCSA's 10.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRT.L Cohort plc | 1.29% | 1.80% | 1.36% | 2.41% | 2.43% | 1.42% | 2.15% | 1.26% | 2.16% | 2.09% | 1.46% | 1.31% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 10.39% | 4.35% | 3.25% | 2.60% | 3.03% | 1.95% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 2.69% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRT.L drawdown since its inception was -72.53%, which is greater than CMCSA's maximum drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRT.L and CMCSA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRT.L | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.53% | -77.16% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.22% | -25.72% | -22.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.22% | -52.11% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -52.11% | +3.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.18% | -40.70% | +16.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.42% | -31.46% | +12.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.30% | 12.42% | +12.88% |
Volatility
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Volatility Comparison
Cohort plc (CHRT.L) has a higher volatility of 14.00% compared to Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) at 6.96%. This indicates that CHRT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHRT.L | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.00% | 6.96% | +7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.65% | 19.92% | +11.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.79% | 26.89% | +21.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.89% | 25.75% | +14.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.28% | 26.41% | +7.87% |
Financials
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohort plc and Comcast Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHRT.L vs. CMCSA - Profitability Comparison
CHRT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohort plc reported a gross profit of 35.06M and revenue of 128.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
CMCSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comcast Corporation reported a gross profit of 19.58B and revenue of 32.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
CHRT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohort plc reported an operating income of 8.20M and revenue of 128.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
CMCSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comcast Corporation reported an operating income of 3.49B and revenue of 32.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
CHRT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohort plc reported a net income of 6.11M and revenue of 128.82M, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
CMCSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comcast Corporation reported a net income of 1.97B and revenue of 32.31B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.