CHRI vs. SIL
CHRI (Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHRI is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Christian Values Screened Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHRI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
CHRI vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRI achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -10.96% return.
CHRI
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- 6M
- -20.89%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 1Y
- 47.84%
- 3Y*
- 40.97%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
CHRI vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHRI Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF | 9.54% | 2.85% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -10.96% | 23.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRI and SIL is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRI vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
CHRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIL
CHRI vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF (CHRI) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHRI | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHRI vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRI drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRI and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRI | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -82.99% | +73.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -37.00% | +35.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | -51.32% | +49.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.57% | — |
Volatility
CHRI vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRI | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 44.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 52.93% | -39.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 39.99% | -26.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 39.82% | -26.26% |
CHRI vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHRI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHRI vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
CHRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than SIL's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRI Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF | 0.39% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.37% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRI and SIL have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHRI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHRI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.39% for CHRI.
CHRI is categorized as S&P 500, while SIL is Silver. CHRI tracks S&P 500 Christian Values Screened Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CHRI and 0.65% for SIL.
Find the right allocation for CHRI and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer