CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L
CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and DGRA.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while DGRA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHRG.L returned 6.01%/yr vs 12.88%/yr for DGRA.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHRG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRA.L.
Performance
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHRG.L is traded in GBp, while DGRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRG.L achieves a 34.75% return, which is significantly higher than DGRA.L's 7.03% return.
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 34.75%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- 109.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRA.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 21.26%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- —
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 34.75% | 44.29% | -11.91% | -9.67% | -19.10% | 14.89% | 72.90% |
DGRA.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 7.03% | 5.03% | 20.29% | 12.77% | 2.58% | 26.46% | 14.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRG.L and DGRA.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.44 |
The correlation between CHRG.L and DGRA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Basic Materials
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Technology
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Energy
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Utilities
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Consumer Defensive
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
Communication Services
CHRG.L
-
DGRA.L
Financial Services
CHRG.L
-
DGRA.L
Healthcare
CHRG.L
-
DGRA.L
Real Estate
CHRG.L
-
DGRA.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHRG.L
DGRA.L
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHRG.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.34 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.80 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 12.21 | -5.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHRG.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.87 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.92 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.93 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRG.L drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRG.L and DGRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRG.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.64% | -23.29% | -29.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -5.57% | -24.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.46% | -18.00% | -21.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.64% | -18.00% | -34.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | 0.00% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -2.98% | -19.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.07% | 1.74% | +14.33% |
Volatility
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.38% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) at 3.27%. This indicates that CHRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRG.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.38% | 3.27% | +7.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 8.42% | +10.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.32% | 11.37% | +40.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.08% | 14.01% | +16.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.55% | 15.54% | +14.01% |
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHRG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHRG.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHRG.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRG.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRA.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.
CHRG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CHRG.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.
Find the right allocation for CHRG.L and DGRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer