PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPY vs. OUNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 88.78% return, which is significantly higher than OUNZ's 0.07% return.


CHPY

1D
5.00%
1M
22.07%
YTD
88.78%
6M
92.44%
1Y
148.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OUNZ

1D
2.54%
1M
-5.03%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.22%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
29.89%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and OUNZ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPY vs. OUNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

OUNZ
OUNZ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OUNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
OUNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPYOUNZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.19

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.31

1.05

+11.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

43.93

3.00

+40.93

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 4.83, which is higher than the OUNZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and OUNZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.19%, smaller than the maximum OUNZ drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and OUNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPYOUNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-24.36%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-24.36%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-20.00%

+20.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-7.60%

+5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

8.54%

-5.14%

Volatility

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 17.55% compared to VanEck Merk Gold Trust (OUNZ) at 8.30%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPYOUNZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.55%

8.30%

+9.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.62%

24.01%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.06%

27.27%

+3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.45%

18.17%

+17.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.45%

16.11%

+19.34%

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OUNZ's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPY vs. OUNZ - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.02%, while OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHPY and OUNZ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (17.55%) compared to OUNZ (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.19% vs OUNZ's -24.36%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 148.83% vs 25.45% for OUNZ. On fees, OUNZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, OUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 148.83% return vs 25.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUNZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.02%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.

CHPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while OUNZ is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Merk. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.25% for OUNZ.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.83 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPY and OUNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer