CHPY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 143.61% vs 5.55% for LQTI. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

CHPY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 82.97% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.63% return.

CHPY

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: 23.37%
• YTD: 82.97%
• 6M: 82.98%
• 1Y: 143.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	82.97%	62.91%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.63%	4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and LQTI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

CHPY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 31
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.23	1.10	+4.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.59	1.60	+3.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.19	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.88	1.64	+10.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	45.33	5.02	+40.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 5.23, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.23	1.10	+4.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.71	0.94	+3.76

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.17%	-3.41%	-8.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.17%	-3.41%	-8.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-0.97%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-0.88%	-1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	1.11%	+2.07%

Volatility

CHPY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.67%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.32%	1.67%	+9.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.41%	4.04%	+18.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.61%	5.12%	+22.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.16%	5.97%	+27.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.16%	5.97%	+27.19%

CHPY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.83%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	28.83%	28.19%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPY and LQTI in my portfolio?

CHPY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPY or LQTI?

CHPY has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to LQTI (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.17% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, CHPY or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 143.61% vs 5.55% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPY or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 143.61% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPY or LQTI?

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.83%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between CHPY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.23 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.