CHPS vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. CHPS is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, CHPS returned 161.82% vs 116.49% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

CHPS vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 97.54% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 8.06% return.

CHPS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -3.32%
• 6M: 77.90%
• YTD: 97.54%
• 1Y: 161.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 116.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	97.54%	64.30%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	8.06%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and WNTR is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.35

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPS	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.82	2.06	+1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	2.34	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.32	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.14	2.60	+6.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.08	6.69	+23.39

CHPS vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-42.65%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-42.65%	+24.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.24%	-11.84%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.11%	-20.57%	+11.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.38%	16.58%	-11.20%

Volatility

CHPS vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 22.94% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 18.80%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.94%	18.80%	+4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.25%	47.57%	-10.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.41%	53.81%	-11.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.33%	53.62%	-17.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.33%	53.62%	-17.29%

CHPS vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	104.11%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and WNTR in my portfolio?

CHPS and WNTR have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPS or WNTR?

CHPS has higher volatility (22.94%) compared to WNTR (18.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 161.82% vs 116.49% for WNTR. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 161.82% return vs 116.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or WNTR?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 0.33% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between CHPS and WNTR?

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.