CHPS vs. SNPD

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and SNPD (Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while SNPD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS returned 54.34%/yr vs 9.12%/yr for SNPD. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

CHPS vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 92.17% return, which is significantly higher than SNPD's 13.50% return.

CHPS

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: -5.95%
• 6M: 72.81%
• YTD: 92.17%
• 1Y: 156.63%
• 3Y*: 54.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNPD

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: 9.66%
• YTD: 13.50%
• 1Y: 15.84%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	92.17%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	13.50%	6.66%	5.41%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and SNPD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.32

The correlation between CHPS and SNPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHPS vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHPS	SNPD
Technology	99.6%	7.3%
Energy	0.6%	3.1%
Industrials	0.4%	16.9%
Financial Services	0.2%	8.0%
Communication Services	0.0%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	18.8%
Basic Materials	-	7.2%
Healthcare	-	5.0%
Real Estate	-	6.8%
Utilities	-	14.3%

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SNPD

SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 48
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPS	SNPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.68	1.43	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	2.15	+1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.24	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.85	1.83	+7.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.22	5.45	+22.77

CHPS vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and SNPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	SNPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-15.80%	-23.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.80%	-8.68%	-9.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.44%	-15.80%	-23.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.60%	-0.58%	-15.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-3.85%	-5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.57%	2.92%	+2.65%

Volatility

CHPS vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 21.97% compared to Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) at 3.55%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	SNPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.97%	3.55%	+18.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.59%	8.28%	+29.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.83%	11.13%	+31.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.45%	13.10%	+23.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.45%	13.10%	+23.35%

CHPS vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHPS and SNPD have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CHPS vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SNPD's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.34%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%
SNPD Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.20%	3.10%	2.78%	2.63%	0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and SNPD in my portfolio?

CHPS and SNPD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPS or SNPD?

CHPS has higher volatility (21.97%) compared to SNPD (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or SNPD?

On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 54.34% vs 9.12% for SNPD. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or SNPD?

Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 54.34% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or SNPD?

CHPS and SNPD have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or SNPD?

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.34% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between CHPS and SNPD?

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while SNPD is Mid Cap Value Equities. CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.