CHPS vs. SEMY
CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and SEMY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while SEMY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. CHPS is passively managed, while SEMY is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for SEMY.
Performance
CHPS vs. SEMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 127.70% return, which is significantly higher than SEMY's 41.34% return.
CHPS
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 25.08%
- YTD
- 127.70%
- 6M
- 129.64%
- 1Y
- 231.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEMY
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 41.34%
- 6M
- 40.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS vs. SEMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 127.70% | 8.69% |
SEMY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF | 41.34% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and SEMY is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. SEMY — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
SEMY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHPS vs. SEMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF (SEMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS | SEMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. SEMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than SEMY's maximum drawdown of -11.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and SEMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | SEMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -11.46% | -27.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -2.50% | -6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | — | — |
Volatility
CHPS vs. SEMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | SEMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.78% | 25.92% | +12.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.16% | 25.92% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.16% | 25.92% | +9.24% |
CHPS vs. SEMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS vs. SEMY - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than SEMY's 91.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
SEMY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Semiconductors ETF | 91.14% | 17.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS and SEMY have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for SEMY.
SEMY has the higher dividend yield at 91.14%, compared with 0.29% for CHPS.
CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while SEMY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 1.07% for SEMY.
Find the right allocation for CHPS and SEMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer