PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPS vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPS vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 70.98% return, which is significantly higher than CHPY's 56.70% return.


CHPS

1D
1.47%
1M
-11.74%
6M
41.98%
YTD
70.98%
1Y
141.43%
3Y*
49.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.83%

CHPY

1D
0.77%
1M
-10.41%
6M
38.53%
YTD
56.70%
1Y
95.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
96.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.66M$2.47M$3.90M
$51.63M$53.85M$60.48M

CHPS vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and CHPY is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.96

The correlation between CHPS and CHPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPS vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPS vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPSCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.40

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

3.46

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.16

15.85

+2.31

CHPS vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPSCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.44%

-27.64%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.74%

-27.64%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-20.20%

-4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-3.08%

-6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

6.01%

+1.81%

Volatility

CHPS vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) at 17.01%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPSCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.17%

17.01%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.21%

33.89%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.64%

38.24%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.27%

39.09%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

39.09%

-1.82%

CHPS vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPS vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than CHPY's 38.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.38%0.68%1.75%0.36%
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
38.40%28.19%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CHPS and CHPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CHPS has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to CHPY (17.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs CHPY's -27.64%.

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 141.43% vs 95.00% for CHPY. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CHPY has been the lower-risk option at 17.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 141.43% return vs 95.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 38.40%, compared with 0.38% for CHPS.

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while CHPY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPS and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer