CHPS vs. AAAU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHPS returned 202.19% vs 22.47% for AAAU. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AAAU.

Performance

CHPS vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 104.33% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's -2.40% return.

CHPS

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: 18.12%
• YTD: 104.33%
• 6M: 111.24%
• 1Y: 202.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAU

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.14%
• 1Y: 22.47%
• 3Y*: 29.19%
• 5Y*: 17.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	104.33%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	-2.40%	64.06%	26.91%	5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and AAAU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.17

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 26
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPS	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.25	0.89	+4.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.99	1.26	+3.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.19	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.29	0.99	+10.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	42.06	2.86	+39.19

CHPS vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 5.25, which is higher than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -24.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and AAAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	AAAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-24.38%	-15.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-24.38%	+6.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-21.95%	+20.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-6.23%	-2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.69%	8.44%	-3.75%

Volatility

CHPS vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 19.27% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 7.77%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	AAAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.27%	7.77%	+11.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.12%	23.88%	+8.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.63%	27.10%	+10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.78%	18.06%	+16.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.78%	17.13%	+17.65%

CHPS vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CHPS vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and AAAU in my portfolio?

CHPS and AAAU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPS or AAAU?

CHPS has higher volatility (19.27%) compared to AAAU (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs AAAU's -24.38%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or AAAU?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 202.19% vs 22.47% for AAAU. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AAAU has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or AAAU?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 202.19% return vs 22.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or AAAU?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for AAAU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or AAAU?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.

What is the main difference between CHPS and AAAU?

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while AAAU is Gold. CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while AAAU tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.18% for AAAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.25 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.