CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHPS-U.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and AIGO.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS-U.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while AIGO.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHPS-U.TO returned 135.95% vs 71.31% for AIGO.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHPS-U.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for AIGO.TO.

Performance

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CHPS-U.TO is traded in USD, while AIGO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AIGO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS-U.TO achieves a 62.87% return, which is significantly higher than AIGO.TO's 36.71% return.

CHPS-U.TO

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 25.87%
• YTD: 62.87%
• 6M: 61.65%
• 1Y: 135.95%
• 3Y*: 49.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIGO.TO

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 21.76%
• YTD: 36.71%
• 6M: 36.95%
• 1Y: 71.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	62.87%	51.84%	-6.36%
AIGO.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF	36.71%	30.67%	13.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS-U.TO and AIGO.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2024	0.32

Return for Risk

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS-U.TO

CHPS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CHPS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

AIGO.TO

AIGO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
AIGO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIGO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AIGO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AIGO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AIGO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPS-U.TO	AIGO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.92	3.08	+0.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	3.77	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.49	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.46	4.27	+6.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	32.71	14.87	+17.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is comparable to the AIGO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS-U.TO and AIGO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPS-U.TO	AIGO.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92	3.08	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	1.66	-1.10

Drawdowns

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than AIGO.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS-U.TO and AIGO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS-U.TO	AIGO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.70%	-27.05%	-26.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	-16.77%	+3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.92%	+0.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-4.10%	-13.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	4.81%	-0.64%

Volatility

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF (AIGO.TO) at 8.19%. This indicates that CHPS-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIGO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS-U.TO	AIGO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.79%	8.19%	+2.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.57%	18.63%	+8.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.90%	23.30%	+11.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.32%	24.95%	+14.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.32%	24.95%	+14.37%

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS-U.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AIGO.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS-U.TO vs. AIGO.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIGO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AIGO.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology Index ETF	0.06%	0.09%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	0.00%	0.01%	0.14%	0.40%	0.72%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS-U.TO and AIGO.TO in my portfolio?

CHPS-U.TO and AIGO.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHPS-U.TO or AIGO.TO?

On fees, AIGO.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS-U.TO or AIGO.TO?

AIGO.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS-U.TO.

What is the main difference between CHPS-U.TO and AIGO.TO?

CHPS-U.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while AIGO.TO is Technology Equities. CHPS-U.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while AIGO.TO tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS-U.TO and 0.60% for AIGO.TO.