CHNR vs. CHCI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR) and Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI).

Performance

CHNR vs. CHCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR) and Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHNR vs. CHCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHNR China Natural Resources, Inc.	15.44%	-33.71%	-57.45%	-15.49%	-35.00%	-57.97%	-33.97%	23.63%	-36.69%	7.66%
CHCI Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.	63.90%	43.81%	82.32%	4.28%	-12.37%	53.00%	62.02%	16.46%	-1.18%	-5.56%

Fundamentals

EPS CHNR : -$2.61 CHCI : $1.33
Total Revenue (TTM) CHNR : $0.00 CHCI : $55.84M
Gross Profit (TTM) CHNR : -$275.00 CHCI : $11.93M
EBITDA (TTM) CHNR : -$7.63M CHCI : $10.21M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHNR achieves a 15.44% return, which is significantly lower than CHCI's 63.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CHNR has underperformed CHCI with an annualized return of -23.13%, while CHCI has yielded a comparatively higher 26.96% annualized return.

CHNR

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: 16.90%
• YTD: 15.44%
• 6M: -17.33%
• 1Y: -6.19%
• 3Y*: -44.89%
• 5Y*: -43.55%
• 10Y*: -23.13%

CHCI

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 67.06%
• YTD: 63.90%
• 6M: 25.88%
• 1Y: 112.56%
• 3Y*: 55.45%
• 5Y*: 27.11%
• 10Y*: 26.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHNR vs. CHCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHNR

CHNR Risk / Return Rank: 40
CHNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CHNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
CHNR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CHNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CHNR Martin Ratio Rank: 36

CHCI

CHCI Risk / Return Rank: 81
CHCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CHCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CHCI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CHCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CHCI Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHNR vs. CHCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR) and Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHNR	CHCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.62	-1.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.35	-1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.30	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	2.73	-2.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	5.13	-5.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHNR vs. CHCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHNR Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the CHCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHNR and CHCI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHNR	CHCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	1.62	-1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	0.44	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.17	0.29	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	-0.06	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between CHNR and CHCI is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHNR vs. CHCI - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHNR nor CHCI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CHNR vs. CHCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHNR drawdown since its inception was -99.88%, roughly equal to the maximum CHCI drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHNR and CHCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHNR	CHCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.88%	-99.80%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.95%	-44.23%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.64%	-51.18%	-44.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.32%	-75.34%	-22.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.85%	-90.84%	-9.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.42%	-92.10%	+2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.70%	23.56%	+11.14%

Volatility

CHNR vs. CHCI - Volatility Comparison

China Natural Resources, Inc. (CHNR) has a higher volatility of 39.05% compared to Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) at 24.24%. This indicates that CHNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHNR	CHCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.05%	24.24%	+14.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.89%	44.93%	+29.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	104.71%	70.08%	+34.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	141.80%	62.62%	+79.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	135.97%	93.06%	+42.91%

Financials