CHCI vs. GDMN
CHCI (Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.) is a stock, while GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Over the past 3 years, CHCI returned 58.81%/yr vs 56.12%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHCI vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHCI achieves a 29.60% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -17.89% return.
CHCI
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 29.60%
- 6M
- 41.01%
- 1Y
- 50.60%
- 3Y*
- 58.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.82%
- 10Y*
- 23.60%
GDMN
- 1D
- -5.34%
- 1M
- -15.68%
- YTD
- -17.89%
- 6M
- -24.58%
- 1Y
- 50.67%
- 3Y*
- 56.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHCI vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCI Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. | 29.60% | 43.81% | 82.32% | 4.28% | -12.37% | 11.24% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -17.89% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHCI and GDMN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHCI vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
CHCI
GDMN
CHCI vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHCI | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 2.68 | -0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHCI vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHCI drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCI and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHCI | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -52.82% | -46.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.23% | -48.76% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.93% | -48.76% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.76% | -46.10% | -46.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.09% | -19.14% | -72.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.54% | 19.00% | +4.54% |
Volatility
CHCI vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) is 16.55%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 22.22%. This indicates that CHCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHCI | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.55% | 22.22% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.83% | 55.20% | -12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.48% | 64.10% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.34% | 48.22% | +13.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.23% | 48.22% | +45.01% |
Dividends
CHCI vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
CHCI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCI Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.29% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHCI and GDMN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (22.22%) compared to CHCI (16.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCI dropped -99.80% vs GDMN's -52.82%.
GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHCI and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer