PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in ICBC Credit Suisse WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF Class B USD Inc (CHIP.L) and ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHIP.L
ICBC Credit Suisse WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF Class B USD Inc
-0.76%23.30%16.51%-99.18%-16.19%-8.56%30.42%23.66%-20.92%34.83%
CHIN.L
ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF
-0.06%23.12%16.56%-17.87%-16.32%-8.88%31.02%22.78%-20.78%35.18%
Different Trading Currencies

CHIP.L is traded in GBp, while CHIN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHIN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIP.L achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly lower than CHIN.L's -0.06% return.


CHIP.L

1D
0.60%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-2.38%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
-77.49%
5Y*
-61.05%
10Y*

CHIN.L

1D
1.48%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHIP.L and CHIN.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIP.L
CHIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CHIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CHIN.L
CHIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CHIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC Credit Suisse WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF Class B USD Inc (CHIP.L) and ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHIP.LCHIN.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

0.94

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

1.33

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

2.07

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.09

5.14

-0.05

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the CHIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIP.L and CHIN.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHIP.LCHIN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

0.94

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-1.22

-0.09

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.90

0.22

-1.12

Correlation

The correlation between CHIP.L and CHIN.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHIP.L nor CHIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
CHIP.L
ICBC Credit Suisse WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF Class B USD Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.31%0.97%1.31%2.48%
CHIN.L
ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%1.01%1.19%2.38%

Drawdowns

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.52%, which is greater than CHIN.L's maximum drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIP.L and CHIN.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHIP.LCHIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.52%

-55.89%

-43.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-13.18%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.44%

-49.89%

-49.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.23%

-25.96%

-73.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.88%

-24.76%

-12.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.46%

+0.06%

Volatility

CHIP.L vs. CHIN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICBC Credit Suisse WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF Class B USD Inc (CHIP.L) is 5.32%, while ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that CHIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHIP.LCHIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

6.25%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

13.19%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.49%

19.18%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.89%

23.21%

+26.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.82%

22.51%

+16.31%