CHIAX vs. SFHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX).
CHIAX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Mar 7, 1999. SFHIX is managed by Shenkman Funds. It was launched on Oct 14, 2014.
Performance
CHIAX vs. SFHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHIAX vs. SFHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIAX Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.99% | 4.25% | 6.85% | 11.03% | -3.14% | 5.03% | 2.32% | 6.67% | -0.22% | 4.33% |
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | -1.02% | 5.70% | 8.14% | 11.50% | -0.95% | 3.90% | 1.77% | 588.11% | 0.53% | 3.64% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CHIAX having a -0.99% return and SFHIX slightly lower at -1.02%. Over the past 10 years, CHIAX has underperformed SFHIX with an annualized return of 4.36%, while SFHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.07% annualized return.
CHIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
SFHIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -1.02%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 26.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIAX vs. SFHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SFHIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHIAX vs. SFHIX — Risk / Return Rank
CHIAX
SFHIX
CHIAX vs. SFHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIAX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.79 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 2.50 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.49 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.71 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | 5.65 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIAX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.79 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.51 | 2.59 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.23 | 0.56 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.52 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIAX and SFHIX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CHIAX vs. SFHIX - Dividend Comparison
CHIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, less than SFHIX's 7.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIAX Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.65% | 7.44% | 7.25% | 7.19% | 3.90% | 3.38% | 4.19% | 4.94% | 4.38% | 3.79% | 4.47% | 4.26% |
SFHIX Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund | 7.01% | 7.61% | 8.07% | 8.06% | 4.99% | 3.20% | 3.93% | 142.83% | 5.03% | 4.00% | 4.22% | 4.58% |
Drawdowns
CHIAX vs. SFHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIAX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than SFHIX's maximum drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIAX and SFHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIAX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -19.94% | -17.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -2.25% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.99% | -5.57% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.94% | -19.94% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.46% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -0.84% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.68% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CHIAX vs. SFHIX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) at 0.70%. This indicates that CHIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHIAX | SFHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.70% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 1.34% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77% | 2.16% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 1.98% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.57% | 46.68% | -43.11% |