CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L
CHI3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities) and JRCE.L (JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) are both China Equities funds. CHI3.L is actively managed, while JRCE.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHI3.L returned -15.83%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for JRCE.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHI3.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JRCE.L.
Performance
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHI3.L is traded in USD, while JRCE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRCE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHI3.L achieves a -36.01% return, which is significantly lower than JRCE.L's 10,919.15% return.
CHI3.L
- 1D
- 6.48%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- 6M
- -44.40%
- YTD
- -36.01%
- 1Y
- -29.49%
- 3Y*
- -15.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JRCE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 10,919.15%
- 1Y
- 33.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHI3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities | -36.01% | 50.00% | 6.20% | -53.60% | -45.60% |
JRCE.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | 10,919.15% | -98.71% | 9.53% | -13.40% | -6.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHI3.L and JRCE.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between CHI3.L and JRCE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHI3.L
JRCE.L
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHI3.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -264.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 88.92 | -87.96 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 0.35 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 0.79 | -1.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHI3.L drawdown since its inception was -84.75%, smaller than the maximum JRCE.L drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI3.L and JRCE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHI3.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.75% | -99.18% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.95% | -99.05% | +35.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.83% | -99.13% | +33.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.35% | -4.59% | -72.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -23.13% | -41.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.35% | 43.28% | -8.93% |
Volatility
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long China ETP Securities (CHI3.L) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) at 8.89%. This indicates that CHI3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRCE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHI3.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.27% | 8.89% | +8.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.76% | 654.42% | -608.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.04% | 26,048.73% | -25,987.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 12,524.11% | -12,441.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.01% | 12,524.11% | -12,441.10% |
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHI3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JRCE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHI3.L vs. JRCE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHI3.L nor JRCE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHI3.L and JRCE.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRCE.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRCE.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHI3.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CHI3.L and 0.40% for JRCE.L.
Find the right allocation for CHI3.L and JRCE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer