PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHG.DE vs. FICO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Chapters Group AG (CHG.DE) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CHG.DE is traded in EUR, while FICO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FICO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHG.DE achieves a -3.49% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -23.08% return. Over the past 10 years, CHG.DE has outperformed FICO with an annualized return of 34.51%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively lower 26.17% annualized return.


CHG.DE

1D
3.76%
1M
20.09%
6M
1.91%
YTD
-3.49%
1Y
-8.14%
3Y*
40.63%
5Y*
42.02%
10Y*
34.51%
ALL TIME*
25.10%

FICO

1D
0.74%
1M
15.74%
6M
-18.06%
YTD
-23.08%
1Y
-16.53%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
26.17%
ALL TIME*
22.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHG.DE
Chapters Group AG
-3.49%63.39%38.80%31.65%4.71%257.35%-8.11%-0.90%105.24%3.62%
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
-23.08%-25.16%82.33%88.63%46.58%-8.79%25.15%104.89%27.79%12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CHG.DE and FICO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2012

0.02

The correlation between CHG.DE and FICO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHG.DE vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHG.DE
CHG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CHG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CHG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FICO
FICO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chapters Group AG (CHG.DE) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHG.DEFICODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

-0.32

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

-0.63

+0.28

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the FICO Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHG.DE and FICO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHG.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum FICO drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHG.DE and FICO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHG.DEFICODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.20%

-71.01%

+19.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.27%

-51.22%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.01%

-65.37%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-65.37%

+18.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

-65.37%

+14.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.42%

-51.26%

+33.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-16.35%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.23%

26.37%

-3.14%

Volatility

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison

Chapters Group AG (CHG.DE) has a higher volatility of 22.36% compared to Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) at 11.24%. This indicates that CHG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHG.DEFICODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.36%

11.24%

+11.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.99%

40.31%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.33%

50.42%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.00%

40.54%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.26%

38.27%

+3.99%

Dividends

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHG.DE nor FICO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHG.DE
Chapters Group AG
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%

Financials

CHG.DE vs. FICO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chapters Group AG and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CHG.DE values in EUR, FICO values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CHG.DE and FICO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHG.DE and FICO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer