PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHEF vs. PFGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHEF vs. PFGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) and Performance Food Group Company (PFGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHEF achieves a 24.64% return, which is significantly higher than PFGC's 7.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CHEF has outperformed PFGC with an annualized return of 17.51%, while PFGC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.39% annualized return.


CHEF

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
24.64%
6M
28.84%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
34.42%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
17.51%

PFGC

1D
0.34%
1M
11.04%
YTD
7.36%
6M
4.25%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
14.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHEF vs. PFGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
24.64%26.38%67.58%-11.57%-0.06%29.62%-32.59%19.17%56.00%29.75%
PFGC
Performance Food Group Company
7.36%6.35%22.27%18.43%27.24%-3.61%-7.52%59.53%-2.51%37.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CHEF and PFGC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2015

0.51

The correlation between CHEF and PFGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHEF:

$3.58B

PFGC:

$15.14B

EPS

CHEF:

$1.73

PFGC:

$2.10

PE Ratio

CHEF:

44.98

PFGC:

46.07

PEG Ratio

CHEF:

1.82

PFGC:

0.49

PS Ratio

CHEF:

0.84

PFGC:

0.23

PB Ratio

CHEF:

5.88

PFGC:

3.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHEF:

$4.26B

PFGC:

$66.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHEF:

$1.04B

PFGC:

$7.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHEF:

$215.30M

PFGC:

$1.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHEF vs. PFGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHEF
CHEF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CHEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CHEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PFGC
PFGC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PFGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PFGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFGC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHEF vs. PFGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) and Performance Food Group Company (PFGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHEFPFGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.08

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.34

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

0.71

+1.89

CHEF vs. PFGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHEF Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the PFGC Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHEF and PFGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHEFPFGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.31

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.45

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.31

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.36

-0.17

Drawdowns

CHEF vs. PFGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHEF drawdown since its inception was -91.26%, which is greater than PFGC's maximum drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHEF and PFGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHEFPFGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.26%

-78.85%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.48%

-25.47%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.19%

-25.47%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.06%

-32.34%

-23.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.26%

-78.85%

-12.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.92%

-11.20%

+6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-11.43%

-14.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.82%

12.17%

-2.35%

Volatility

CHEF vs. PFGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. (CHEF) is 6.09%, while Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that CHEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHEFPFGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

8.05%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.61%

23.14%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.52%

28.07%

+10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.23%

32.35%

+7.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.62%

45.99%

+13.63%

Dividends

CHEF vs. PFGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHEF nor PFGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CHEF vs. PFGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. and Performance Food Group Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.06B
16.29B
(CHEF) Total Revenue
(PFGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHEF vs. PFGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. and Performance Food Group Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20222023202420252026
24.3%
11.9%
Portfolio components
CHEF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 257.37M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.3%.

PFGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a gross profit of 1.94B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

CHEF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.13M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

PFGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported an operating income of 148.90M and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

CHEF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. reported a net income of 17.37M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.

PFGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a net income of 41.70M and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHEF and PFGC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFGC has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to CHEF (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHEF dropped -91.26% vs PFGC's -78.85%.

CHEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHEF and PFGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer