PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFGC vs. USFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PFGC vs. USFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) and US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFGC achieves a 26.07% return, which is significantly lower than USFD's 34.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFGC having a 15.24% annualized return and USFD not far behind at 14.79%.


PFGC

1D
1.18%
1M
8.93%
6M
24.69%
YTD
26.07%
1Y
19.57%
3Y*
22.96%
5Y*
18.45%
10Y*
15.24%

USFD

1D
1.51%
1M
8.21%
6M
33.59%
YTD
34.07%
1Y
25.36%
3Y*
31.76%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFGC vs. USFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFGC
Performance Food Group Company
26.07%6.35%22.27%18.43%27.24%-3.61%-7.52%59.53%-2.51%37.92%
USFD
US Foods Holding Corp.
34.07%11.65%48.56%33.48%-2.33%4.56%-20.48%32.40%-0.91%16.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PFGC and USFD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2016

0.68

The correlation between PFGC and USFD shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PFGC:

$17.81B

USFD:

$22.24B

EPS

PFGC:

$2.09

USFD:

$3.00

PE Ratio

PFGC:

54.12

USFD:

33.66

PEG Ratio

PFGC:

0.58

USFD:

0.58

PS Ratio

PFGC:

0.27

USFD:

0.57

PB Ratio

PFGC:

3.76

USFD:

5.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

PFGC:

$66.75B

USFD:

$39.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PFGC:

$7.92B

USFD:

$6.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

PFGC:

$1.04B

USFD:

$1.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFGC vs. USFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFGC
PFGC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PFGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFGC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PFGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

USFD
USFD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
USFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFD Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFGC vs. USFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) and US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFGCUSFDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.19

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.23

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

2.54

-0.47

PFGC vs. USFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the USFD Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFGC and USFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFGC vs. USFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFGC drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, roughly equal to the maximum USFD drawdown of -77.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFGC and USFD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFGCUSFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.85%

-77.30%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.47%

-21.09%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.47%

-21.09%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.34%

-32.80%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.85%

-77.30%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-3.17%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-12.86%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.27%

10.19%

+2.08%

Volatility

PFGC vs. USFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is 6.76%, while US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that PFGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFGCUSFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

7.87%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.72%

23.34%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.87%

28.87%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.19%

29.96%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.02%

38.95%

+7.07%

Dividends

PFGC vs. USFD - Dividend Comparison

Neither PFGC nor USFD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PFGC vs. USFD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Performance Food Group Company and US Foods Holding Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
16.29B
9.61B
(PFGC) Total Revenue
(USFD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PFGC vs. USFD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Performance Food Group Company and US Foods Holding Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.9%
17.2%
Portfolio components
PFGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a gross profit of 1.94B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

USFD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, US Foods Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.65B and revenue of 9.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.

PFGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported an operating income of 148.90M and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

USFD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, US Foods Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 216.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

PFGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a net income of 41.70M and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

USFD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, US Foods Holding Corp. reported a net income of 116.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PFGC and USFD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USFD has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to PFGC (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFGC dropped -78.85% vs USFD's -77.30%.

USFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFGC and USFD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer