PFGC vs. USFD
PFGC (Performance Food Group Company) and USFD (US Foods Holding Corp.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Food Distribution industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, PFGC returned 15.54%/yr vs 15.39%/yr for USFD. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
PFGC vs. USFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFGC achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly lower than USFD's 33.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PFGC having a 15.54% annualized return and USFD not far behind at 15.39%.
PFGC
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 13.82%
- 3Y*
- 23.70%
- 5Y*
- 20.08%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.03%
USFD
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- YTD
- 33.55%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 32.69%
- 5Y*
- 23.98%
- 10Y*
- 15.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $174.22M | $180.72M | $175.43M | |
| $211.81M | $241.02M | $259.94M |
PFGC vs. USFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFGC Performance Food Group Company | 27.21% | 6.35% | 22.27% | 18.43% | 27.24% | -3.61% | -7.52% | 59.53% | -2.51% | 37.92% |
USFD US Foods Holding Corp. | 33.55% | 11.65% | 48.56% | 33.48% | -2.33% | 4.56% | -20.48% | 32.40% | -0.91% | 16.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFGC and USFD is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2016 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PFGC and USFD shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PFGC:
$17.97B
USFD:
$22.15B
PFGC:
$2.09
USFD:
$3.00
PFGC:
54.61
USFD:
33.53
PFGC:
0.59
USFD:
0.57
PFGC:
0.27
USFD:
0.57
PFGC:
3.80
USFD:
5.19
PFGC:
$66.75B
USFD:
$39.68B
PFGC:
$7.92B
USFD:
$6.90B
PFGC:
$1.04B
USFD:
$1.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFGC vs. USFD — Risk / Return Rank
PFGC
USFD
PFGC vs. USFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) and US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFGC | USFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.16 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.99 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 2.02 | -0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFGC vs. USFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFGC drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, roughly equal to the maximum USFD drawdown of -77.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFGC and USFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFGC | USFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.85% | -77.30% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.47% | -21.09% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.47% | -21.09% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.34% | -32.80% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.85% | -77.30% | -1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -3.55% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -12.81% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.27% | 10.29% | +1.98% |
Volatility
PFGC vs. USFD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is 7.20%, while US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) has a volatility of 8.87%. This indicates that PFGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFGC | USFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 8.87% | -1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.34% | 22.92% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.58% | 29.30% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.05% | 29.89% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.05% | 38.99% | +7.06% |
Dividends
PFGC vs. USFD - Dividend Comparison
Neither PFGC nor USFD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PFGC vs. USFD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Performance Food Group Company and US Foods Holding Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PFGC vs. USFD - Profitability Comparison
PFGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a gross profit of 1.94B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
USFD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, US Foods Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 1.65B and revenue of 9.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.2%.
PFGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported an operating income of 148.90M and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.
USFD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, US Foods Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 216.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
PFGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Performance Food Group Company reported a net income of 41.70M and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.
USFD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, US Foods Holding Corp. reported a net income of 116.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PFGC and USFD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USFD has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to PFGC (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFGC dropped -78.85% vs USFD's -77.30%.
USFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFGC and USFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer