PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHDEX vs. TMMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund (CHDEX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHDEX achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than TMMAX's 4.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHDEX having a 9.78% annualized return and TMMAX not far ahead at 10.01%.


CHDEX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.88%
YTD
8.03%
6M
9.70%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
9.78%

TMMAX

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.84%
YTD
4.41%
6M
4.66%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHDEX
Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund
8.03%18.04%20.77%2.76%-4.50%26.34%-4.36%19.69%-5.40%16.79%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
4.41%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.32%24.00%-2.84%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CHDEX and TMMAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2007

0.89

The correlation between CHDEX and TMMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHDEX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHDEX
CHDEX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CHDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CHDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund (CHDEX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHDEXTMMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.20

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.67

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

5.82

+6.32

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHDEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHDEX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHDEXTMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.17

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.50

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.56

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Drawdowns

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHDEX drawdown since its inception was -49.12%, which is greater than TMMAX's maximum drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDEX and TMMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHDEXTMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.12%

-41.50%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-5.78%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-23.00%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.57%

-23.00%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-33.41%

-3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-6.88%

+5.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-5.57%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.65%

+0.13%

Volatility

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund (CHDEX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) at 2.07%. This indicates that CHDEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHDEXTMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.07%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

5.83%

+1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.17%

8.24%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.09%

19.07%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.81%

-1.70%

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHDEX and TMMAX have an expense ratio of 1.00%.


Dividends

CHDEX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

CHDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.11%, less than TMMAX's 24.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHDEX
Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund
14.11%15.18%25.41%12.44%7.46%10.89%11.08%6.24%14.14%9.93%5.24%5.05%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
24.23%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHDEX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHDEX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to TMMAX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHDEX dropped -49.12% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

CHDEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHDEX and TMMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer