CHCLX vs. IMIDX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX).
CHCLX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 7, 1938. IMIDX is managed by Congress. It was launched on Oct 31, 2012.
Performance
CHCLX vs. IMIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHCLX vs. IMIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund | -8.44% | 6.67% | 17.37% | 18.72% | -36.11% | 11.63% | 52.90% | 39.99% | -4.56% | 32.58% |
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.83% | -4.88% | 18.11% | 16.29% | -26.94% | 29.42% | 30.57% | 42.36% | -4.98% | 15.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHCLX achieves a -8.44% return, which is significantly lower than IMIDX's -2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCLX has outperformed IMIDX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while IMIDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.30% annualized return.
CHCLX
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -10.11%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 12.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
IMIDX
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- -2.83%
- 6M
- -9.79%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHCLX vs. IMIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHCLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than IMIDX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHCLX vs. IMIDX — Risk / Return Rank
CHCLX
IMIDX
CHCLX vs. IMIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHCLX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.17 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 0.39 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.05 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.14 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 0.35 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHCLX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.17 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.11 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.49 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.59 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHCLX and IMIDX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHCLX vs. IMIDX - Dividend Comparison
CHCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.67%, less than IMIDX's 13.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCLX AB Discovery Growth Fund | 12.67% | 11.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.54% | 15.15% | 13.36% | 20.33% | 6.74% | 0.00% | 6.08% |
IMIDX Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund | 13.66% | 13.27% | 27.75% | 6.27% | 5.80% | 12.29% | 2.06% | 10.80% | 2.99% | 0.04% | 1.11% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
CHCLX vs. IMIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHCLX drawdown since its inception was -63.85%, which is greater than IMIDX's maximum drawdown of -35.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCLX and IMIDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHCLX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.85% | -35.15% | -28.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.70% | -12.10% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.63% | -34.88% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.63% | -35.15% | -9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.05% | -13.30% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.23% | -7.26% | -6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.64% | -0.18% |
Volatility
CHCLX vs. IMIDX - Volatility Comparison
AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Congress Mid Cap Growth Fund (IMIDX) at 6.85%. This indicates that CHCLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHCLX | IMIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.55% | 6.85% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.74% | 13.52% | +4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.84% | 20.45% | +6.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 21.12% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 20.93% | +3.87% |