PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHCLX vs. APGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCLX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than APGYX's 2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCLX has underperformed APGYX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while APGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


CHCLX

1D
-0.58%
1M
-6.78%
6M
2.57%
YTD
6.31%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
10.85%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
12.22%
ALL TIME*
9.16%

APGYX

1D
1.21%
1M
-0.93%
6M
2.53%
YTD
2.06%
1Y
7.97%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
15.77%
ALL TIME*
10.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHCLX
AB Discovery Growth Fund
6.31%6.67%17.37%18.72%-36.11%11.63%52.90%39.99%-4.56%32.58%
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
2.06%13.25%25.40%35.01%-28.78%28.92%34.38%34.13%2.22%31.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCLX and APGYX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996

0.84

The correlation between CHCLX and APGYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHCLX vs. APGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHCLX
CHCLX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CHCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CHCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

APGYX
APGYX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
APGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
APGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHCLXAPGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.08

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

0.41

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

1.42

+1.16

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is comparable to the APGYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCLX and APGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCLX drawdown since its inception was -63.85%, roughly equal to the maximum APGYX drawdown of -66.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCLX and APGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHCLXAPGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.85%

-66.33%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.70%

-15.24%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.36%

-21.59%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.63%

-33.91%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.63%

-33.91%

-10.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.66%

-4.04%

-7.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.15%

-20.91%

+6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

4.39%

+0.50%

Volatility

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Volatility Comparison

AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) at 4.58%. This indicates that CHCLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHCLXAPGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

4.58%

+3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

12.35%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

15.55%

+9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

20.33%

+5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.10%

19.73%

+5.37%

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHCLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than APGYX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHCLX vs. APGYX - Dividend Comparison

CHCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, more than APGYX's 9.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
9.56%9.76%6.58%1.65%0.86%7.17%2.59%3.43%9.08%3.77%2.67%8.57%
CHCLX
AB Discovery Growth Fund
10.91%11.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%17.54%15.15%13.36%20.33%6.74%0.00%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHCLX and APGYX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHCLX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to APGYX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCLX dropped -63.85% vs APGYX's -66.33%.

CHCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHCLX and APGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer