PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHCLX vs. ALTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCLX achieves a 20.34% return, which is significantly higher than ALTFX's 4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCLX has outperformed ALTFX with an annualized return of 14.30%, while ALTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.


CHCLX

1D
1.80%
1M
5.53%
YTD
20.34%
6M
16.91%
1Y
33.35%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
14.30%

ALTFX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.81%
YTD
4.72%
6M
3.71%
1Y
7.89%
3Y*
7.86%
5Y*
2.45%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHCLX
AB Discovery Growth Fund
20.34%6.67%17.37%18.72%-36.11%11.63%52.90%39.99%-4.56%32.58%
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
4.72%6.22%5.94%15.97%-27.19%22.64%39.40%33.60%-9.86%37.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCLX and ALTFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 1996

0.84

The correlation between CHCLX and ALTFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHCLX vs. ALTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHCLX
CHCLX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CHCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CHCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTFX
ALTFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ALTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) and AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHCLXALTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.11

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

0.56

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

1.65

+6.51

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the ALTFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCLX and ALTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCLX drawdown since its inception was -63.85%, smaller than the maximum ALTFX drawdown of -80.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCLX and ALTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHCLXALTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.85%

-80.01%

+16.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.70%

-15.81%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.36%

-22.92%

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.63%

-35.87%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.63%

-35.87%

-8.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.94%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.17%

-36.89%

+22.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

5.33%

-1.10%

Volatility

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Volatility Comparison

AB Discovery Growth Fund (CHCLX) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund (ALTFX) at 5.78%. This indicates that CHCLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHCLXALTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

5.78%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.11%

12.52%

+6.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.59%

15.28%

+8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.93%

18.32%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.07%

18.05%

+7.02%

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHCLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTFX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHCLX vs. ALTFX - Dividend Comparison

CHCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, less than ALTFX's 12.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALTFX
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Fund
12.92%13.53%8.18%0.03%2.61%9.99%7.23%6.01%8.36%0.00%4.05%0.00%
CHCLX
AB Discovery Growth Fund
9.64%11.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%17.54%15.15%13.36%20.33%6.74%0.00%6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHCLX and ALTFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHCLX has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to ALTFX (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCLX dropped -63.85% vs ALTFX's -80.01%.

CHCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHCLX and ALTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer