CHCGX vs. FOCKX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CHCGX (Chesapeake Growth Fund) and FOCKX (Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CHCGX returned 10.76%/yr vs 21.33%/yr for FOCKX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CHCGX charges 1.67%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FOCKX.

Performance

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCGX achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCGX has underperformed FOCKX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while FOCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.33% annualized return.

CHCGX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 2.97%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 1Y: 10.97%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 3.94%
• 10Y*: 10.76%
• ALL TIME*: 8.15%

FOCKX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -4.01%
• 6M: 16.51%
• YTD: 19.73%
• 1Y: 37.95%
• 3Y*: 29.29%
• 5Y*: 15.91%
• 10Y*: 21.33%
• ALL TIME*: 16.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund	3.32%	16.21%	10.98%	24.70%	-28.72%	15.48%	24.23%	27.99%	-1.74%	23.65%
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K	19.73%	22.28%	38.91%	42.92%	-32.07%	25.06%	46.83%	39.36%	-3.18%	38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCGX and FOCKX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008	0.91

The correlation between CHCGX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CHCGX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHCGX

CHCGX Risk / Return Rank: 16
CHCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CHCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CHCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
CHCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
CHCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FOCKX

FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHCGX	FOCKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	1.69	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	2.29	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.29	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	3.15	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.64	10.71	-8.07

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCGX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCGX drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than FOCKX's maximum drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCGX and FOCKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHCGX	FOCKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.09%	-53.33%	-6.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.44%	-11.28%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.34%	-24.83%	+5.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.28%	-36.97%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.28%	-36.97%	+3.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-7.68%	+5.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.35%	-8.34%	-6.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.30%	+0.22%

Volatility

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) is 4.16%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that CHCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHCGX	FOCKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	6.30%	-2.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	17.30%	-6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.79%	21.01%	-7.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.38%	23.17%	-4.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.78%	22.61%	-3.83%

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHCGX has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FOCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHCGX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

CHCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than FOCKX's 6.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund	7.41%	7.65%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	5.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K	6.31%	7.56%	16.42%	0.09%	3.97%	11.34%	6.18%	7.49%	7.81%	4.85%	3.25%	5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHCGX and FOCKX in my portfolio?

CHCGX and FOCKX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHCGX or FOCKX?

FOCKX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to CHCGX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCGX dropped -60.09% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.